BuzzerBeater Forums

I think share or don't the "secret" go person by person.

No one is forced to show your winner way - and by this way loss next games

However, exist user, like Nacht, me and others that no see problem about this.

What the truth? What the real secret?

I think don't have a "truth" about anything on BB.

Is only just research, watching games, analysis, understanding about basketball, making correlation between skills, tactics, own and opponents, try to "discovery" opponent skills too... and conclude.

And each concludes according to their personal experiences, game experiences, technical and practical knowledge. So you will find numerous answers to the same question, because BB is not a science that will consider only 2 facts like 2 + 2 and give you a result = 4

And no one is forced too acept the results shared here. But, if you like one, make a test. If don't like, make like Nacht, me, Manon and others and have your own research and conclusions.


And I think too when says "how build a 3-2 team" is a other view to analysis. If I know how build a 3-2 team, so, I know your weakness and how maybe to beat them.

If I belive the outsiders opponent have 10 OD skills, my PG need a PA > 10 and HA > 10 but < PA - if HA >= PA the player made a selfish and don't make assists.

And to attack, mid-range shots to SG. SF and PF.

All this is my opinion.

Nobody is forced to share something that they have discovered alone.

We are only certain of one thing: everything is subjective and interpretive

I think his flow was better. Your offense was better and defense as well. But his flow was higher, His all around passing team skills beat you. Since your Bigs could not create assist nor pass the ball well.

Extremely useful contribution, that was exactly what I was thinking when I wrote that (292477.29)

I found the 3-2 really attractive and effective, especially in lower division (if well built). But if think it's hard to find an economic sustainability long term when the competition is really high

Yes but i made this thread to get clues and assistace on how to beat 3-2. So saying you do not want share that you say it in wrong thread. People look something else in here.

Honestly, the best answer I can give is a slight twist on the obnoxious but obvious answer. The obnoxious answer is "score more points than them" but I think, really, the optimal path is "make them score less than you."

Trying to overcome the OD when a good opponent has a 3-2 is a battle that has diminishing returns, because adding one or two more levels of OD is a lot easier, cheaper and faster than adding the corresponding amount of JS + JR + flow or driving skills. So I think instead the best bet is to be as effective as you can offensively, but aim to be so overwhelming defensively that your ability to occasionally hit three point shots will give you just enough of an advantage to come out on top.

Well, that, and make sure your team is well-trained in free throws, not that you'll likely get to take many outside of a late lead.

Last edited by GM-hrudey at 2/22/2018 1:16:53 PM

1. Yes, when you play 3-2 zone your rating is lower and SB doesn't increase your defence ratings. Inside defence was much more better as you can see on number of blocks 21-3..

In generally: I had pretty OK team for 3-2 zone but problem was that my SF isn't that good and I played mainly only one decent PG or SG at the time. Now I have to rase money and will sell few players away. IMO OD isn't that important on 3-2 zone, of course you have to have decent players but not monsters. I guess I also mainly have played against teams which don't have such a strong outside skills.

At the moment I have one NT player and I will still giving training to him but after he is done I will start to train my own inside players. There are almost ever decent inside players for 3-2 zone in the transfer list. So, I have to training those to my self. Long road will be start soon..