BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Minor suggestions 3

Minor suggestions 3 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
273519.591 in reply to 273519.590
Date: 10/18/2017 5:51:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
487487
You and I clearly disagree at what an “in game advantage” is. I’m talking about BB as a whole. Getting a leg up on an arena or anything else you can pay real world money for gives an advantage over someone that doesn’t pay. Just like in my example, that person can afford better players sooner which translates to how you’re interpreting “in game advantage” and gives them better chances to win each game.

I once had a team with 1757 players and was $25,835,360 in debt. This is not that team. Join the Discord group open to anyone, but especially for USA managers to improve your club or get involved with the U21 and NT programs (https://discord.gg/cKpNkt2).
This Post:
00
273519.592 in reply to 273519.591
Date: 10/18/2017 6:06:42 AM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
13911391
Yes, I'm referring to an advantage as something that cannot be accessed without paying for it. If a non-paying manager can still buy the same players and build the same arena as a paying user, it only takes him more time, I don't see a problem with that. What I do see a problem is in granting paying users access to something a non-paying user cannot get, like paying to get higher cap on your arena or boosting in-game performance.

As long as time to get to the top league/B3/win a cup is not something that this game is about, I see no problem in having people pay to speed up progress. What difference does it make for a manager if he loses to someone who started BB at the same time as him but paid to get a good roster sooner, or to someone that just started before him and got that same good roster just by playing the game longer?

This Post:
00
273519.594 in reply to 273519.592
Date: 10/18/2017 7:00:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
487487
It makes a big difference in my opinion if a manager loses to someone that started at the same time because the other manager paid real world money for a complete arena and a better roster. Length of time playing is a different advantage completely to paying to get ahead. I think you'll not only find pushback from BBs on that as a pay to play, but a lot of longtime managers will leave the game if it ever comes to that.

I once had a team with 1757 players and was $25,835,360 in debt. This is not that team. Join the Discord group open to anyone, but especially for USA managers to improve your club or get involved with the U21 and NT programs (https://discord.gg/cKpNkt2).
This Post:
00
273519.595 in reply to 273519.594
Date: 10/18/2017 12:50:13 PM
Leones del Cinaruco
FCBBP
Overall Posts Rated:
27092709
Aren't this the "Minor Suggestions" Thread?

From: No-name
This Post:
00
273519.596 in reply to 273519.595
Date: 10/19/2017 10:23:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Hi to all, I had a suggestion for making BB even more fun than it is now. I suggest that All-Star teams to be selected by some manager that it is voted to be a coach of the west/east, lets say like in NT and U21. And the both coaches can make tactics and all the stuff. All the best :)

This Post:
11
273519.598 in reply to 273519.597
Date: 10/20/2017 5:55:33 AM
Vattjom Vatos
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
257257
Second Team:
Utopia Vatos
I suggest "Individual Training" as a complement to current training.

It would work just like ordinary training(trainer, height, age and elastic effect), but with a much lower effect, like 5-10%? of ordinary training dosage(based on selection of training). Other training restriction apply, like cap hit but they are not bound to playing minutes or positions. This is not meant to give every player 2 extra pops every season, but a bonus pop every now and then.
This way you could try to get a players Stamina or Free Throws up a level over a couple of seasons without having to train the whole team a week or two every season. Or any other Skill for that matter. All forms of training is available, individual or team, except game shape.

It's also more realistic, that players actually learn something even if the don't play on the training position that week.

A player who is recieving ordinary training will focus 100% on that, but if he doesn't get 48+min training, he will recieve (up to 100% total training) his individual training.
Lets say Player A trains Shot Blocking but only gets 47min on the C position this week, he gets his ordinary training and that's calculated to, lets say, roughly 97% of ordinary training, that means there's space for 3% of the individual training.
Player B how only gets 20min on the C position gets his normal amount of individual training 5-10%.

Players will develop(very slowly) even if they don't recieve any (ordinary) training and it should be easier to develop lower skills than higher. Maybe there should be a ceiling on how high this individual training actually works.

Since your TO:s usually don't get individual training and the training dosage is so small, there will still be need for Team Training like Stamina and Free Throws to raise these skills on your team.

From: zlpy2

This Post:
00
273519.601 in reply to 273519.1
Date: 11/21/2017 2:08:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Please add draft day! This would make this game so much cooler. Like you could pick a player from the draft :)

Advertisement