BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 1-3-1

1-3-1

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
118675.6 in reply to 118675.4
Date: 11/13/2009 3:50:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
---------------SG(3)
----------------\
-----------------\
PG(1)-----------SF(4)----C(5)---O[
-----------------/
----------------/
---------------SG(2)

I have been operating under this assumption.

From: ulf1der
This Post:
00
118675.7 in reply to 118675.6
Date: 11/14/2009 5:30:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
If the point gaurd is under the basket, does he need inside defending to make the tactic more effective?

This Post:
00
118675.8 in reply to 118675.7
Date: 11/14/2009 7:58:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
The 1-3-1 is definitely not run with the PG defending the basket. You are likely are terrible coach.

http://www.coachesclipboard.net/131zonedefense.html

This Post:
00
118675.9 in reply to 118675.8
Date: 11/14/2009 11:34:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
playing a 1-3-1 with a guard under the basket is pretty common because this position needs to be fast to close the lane, i don't think in sense of Buzzerbeater but in RL you wull see this.

This Post:
00
118675.10 in reply to 118675.8
Date: 11/15/2009 1:26:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Nice cheesy website you found that on. Watch some basketball on TV see a real team run the 1-3-1 before you attack other people. In this game they may not do it but the PG plays the bottom spot in lots of 1-3-1 defenses run but people a lot smarter than you.

This Post:
00
118675.11 in reply to 118675.10
Date: 11/16/2009 5:22:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
In RL, I don't think there is just one flavor of 1-3-1 zones. Some teams like to trap out of this defense while others don't. I think one common case is that the "player under the basket" isn't really an insider defender exclusively -- he's also responsible for sliding out to each of the corners with the rotation of the ball.

One way to beat this defense is to swing the ball around or throw it over the zone from one corner to the other. This defender then will be out of position, leaving the man in the "weak side" corner open from a 3 pointer.


This Post:
00
118675.12 in reply to 118675.1
Date: 11/18/2009 12:37:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Hey coach, but what's the advantages that using 1-3-1 defense? I mean in BB...what's the focus point?

This Post:
00
118675.13 in reply to 118675.12
Date: 11/18/2009 12:45:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
This Post:
00
118675.14 in reply to 118675.13
Date: 11/18/2009 3:08:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thx Oop~~~

But that requests PG/SG/SF all have good OD skill, right? PF/C's OD skill will be taken into consideration or not?

Suppose there are 2 teams both using the 1-3-1.

A team with PG( OD 15), SG ( OD 10), SF ( OD 10)
B team with PG (OD 12), SG (OD 12), SF (OD 12)

They will play with the same team C, with PG (JS/JR 11/11), SG(JS/JR 16/12), SF(JS/JR 15/12)

Which team will have higher OD performance? A or B?

And for next season as we can switch the Defense position, the ranking will be higher if A team put PG to defense SG of C team?

This Post:
00
118675.15 in reply to 118675.14
Date: 11/18/2009 6:02:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i think b is a little bit stronger(i could be wrong), and in a zone the switch to the offense player of the opponent don't have much effect for man to man this would be a good decision.

This Post:
00
118675.16 in reply to 118675.15
Date: 11/18/2009 7:46:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
So after the defense positions can be switched, 1-3-1 will be less preferable for teams that have at least one good outside defender, right?
Especially when opponent has only one superstar...let's say, one Great outside shooting SF, can use good outside defending PG to lock him up, without sacrifying our inside defense and rebounding.

Can we say that 1-3-1 will be less coach perferrable after the new enhancement?

Advertisement