BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Low player ratings

Low player ratings

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125791.6 in reply to 125791.2
Date: 12/31/2009 5:30:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Such a low rating is not a big surprise with an atrocious OD, I guess...


for me a bit, because defence didn't matter in the ratings when they defend a different position ;) But i would sell him, because player without D seems uselexss for me, the other way seems to be workng better.

This Post:
00
125791.7 in reply to 125791.6
Date: 12/31/2009 5:38:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
906906
Such a low rating is not a big surprise with an atrocious OD, I guess...


for me a bit, because defence didn't matter in the ratings when they defend a different position ;)


Is that true? If I have my PG defend the opponent's SF, the PG's defense doesn't play a role in his rating? I can't imagine that :-|


We have both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
This Post:
00
125791.8 in reply to 125791.7
Date: 12/31/2009 5:45:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(17965159) the sg defends center, the PG the PF spot.

This Post:
00
125791.9 in reply to 125791.8
Date: 12/31/2009 6:00:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
906906
Yes, and their ratings are crap because they probably don't have the skills to defend the PF and the C. So how does this support your argumentation?

Didn't you say that their defense doesn't influence the player rating if they defend out of position?

We have both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
This Post:
00
125791.10 in reply to 125791.9
Date: 12/31/2009 6:02:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Yes, and their ratings are crap because they probably don't have the skills to defend the PF and the C. So how does this support your argumentation?

Didn't you say that their defense doesn't influence the player rating if they defend out of position?


so you think the sg got a 2,5 in rating, with 60k salary and can defend the c? how do you think he is looking IS 27 ID 1 and Reb 1?

This Post:
00
125791.11 in reply to 125791.10
Date: 12/31/2009 6:56:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I am sorry, but your center was got absolutely torched on defense. The opposig centers shot 11/13 for a PP100 of 130+. This speaks for a very, very poor defensive rating.

This makes sense, given that his backup is almost as good as your starter, his starter has x2 the salary of your player, and your guy never got any rest during the game.

Toss in the god-awful offense, which was not unexpected, and you have a 2.5 rating.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 12/31/2009 6:57:04 AM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
125791.12 in reply to 125791.11
Date: 12/31/2009 7:00:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
he has ID 13 and reb 13, just for information and performance seems to haveN#t impa ct on the ratings. And why the quality of the opposition takes place in the player rating, in this casse i wonder why my rating usually are better then the one of a fourth league game ;)

Edit: (179651.7) here he get 11 rating with 48 min playing time ;) So IS makes the most of the rating, right? maybe 98%, because his offense uardskills ain't just ones. but if IS is the only factor for centers, why OFd is so powerrfll for guards, who are great in the offensiv game?

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/31/2009 7:10:43 AM

This Post:
00
125791.13 in reply to 125791.12
Date: 12/31/2009 7:42:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
And why the quality of the opposition takes place in the player rating,


Where offense and defense is concerned, performance ratings take in account how well a player has done on the offensive end, and how well he has done in stopping his opposition.

You can't consider these in a vacuum -- a player will get better shots against an inferior defender, and will struggle to stop someone who's more skilled than him.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
125791.14 in reply to 125791.13
Date: 12/31/2009 10:06:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but thuis can only make around 0,5 points in my experience, or not? Else we should have the same player ratings in league four then in league on. because i didn't notice differents in rating, betwenn league and cup matches, and there the players shine against weak competition if they play, and not get the double or truiple rating.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/31/2009 10:07:34 AM

This Post:
00
125791.15 in reply to 125791.14
Date: 12/31/2009 3:51:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
but thuis can only make around 0,5 points in my experience, or not? Else we should have the same player ratings in league four then in league on. because i didn't notice differents in rating, betwenn league and cup matches, and there the players shine against weak competition if they play, and not get the double or truiple rating.

The real question is, I guess, how well does this player do, on average, when he's set to play SG without a special defensive assignment. If it's significantly better than 2.5, then we have a problem.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
125791.16 in reply to 125791.15
Date: 1/1/2010 7:18:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but thuis can only make around 0,5 points in my experience, or not? Else we should have the same player ratings in league four then in league on. because i didn't notice differents in rating, betwenn league and cup matches, and there the players shine against weak competition if they play, and not get the double or truiple rating.

The real question is, I guess, how well does this player do, on average, when he's set to play SG without a special defensive assignment. If it's significantly better than 2.5, then we have a problem.


i think if it not much worse it should be a problem(OD=1), and in scrimmage i figure out that ratings below too are nearly impossible to provide.