Yeah i still don't really see its necessary to produce a great SF.
That's very subjective position. But it's ok. I like being different and having my own approach to BB, and I want to have a third option - besides playing SG or PF in SF position.
I think the general consensus is that that above level 5 higher level trainers add a couple of weeks of weeks of training if that. I guess after 6 seasons that might equate to possibly 4 pops.
Still this is only speculation. But lets say it's actually a fact. Don't you think 4 pops is a small gain? And remember, we are not talking about some weak SF's with prominent skills. We are talking about wondrous kinda SF's. It's like:
JS
16 JR 14
OD
15 NH 12
DV 12 PA 10
IS
13 ID
14RB 13 SB 8
compared to one pop more to 4 skills:
JS
17 JR 15
OD
16 HN 12
DV 12 PA 10
IS
14 ID 15RB 13 SB 8
I think these 4 pops add quite good amount of quality.
... training will still slow with a level 7 trainer.
Exactly! But let us continue with the debate. This is the case: There are 3 moments in BB that the user can't change (or influence): 1. player's height, 2. player potential and 3. ever-increasing age (aggressiveness is the last, but not directly related to training). All of these "moments" are resisting forces of training development through the basketball life of a BB player. If we take age for an example. It is a resisting force that (i believe) must have a strictly defined resisting value for a given age with trainer level 1 - default resisting value for that age. Let's say that at age 21 this default resisting value is 10 (height and potential have favorable value). How can you lower this resistance? The answer is trainer level. The higher the level, the lower the resistance. So, with level 7 you will lower this resistance better compared to level 6. The conclusion is that level 7 must give you better results than level 6 at every given age of the player.