BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > defensive sf more expepensive?

defensive sf more expepensive?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Dinarius

This Post:
00
185811.7 in reply to 185811.6
Date: 5/25/2011 11:24:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
It's fully understandable, but there are two possible ways how to decrease the salary and increase efficiency:
1) It is possible to use 2 SFs (One more for OD, one more orintated for ID) - it will help to spot nearly every team, but have to manage the GS well
2) Decrease the requirements of defensive skills - for example, my SF (With OD 11 and ID 9 but multiskilled in the start of season gets less than 9k) - I'm planning to train him up to OD 13 and ID 10 level - so it will not be big boost in salary, but anyhow he is not able to stop a PF, playing on this position with Inside orientated atack of the oponent) - it's desision of team maneger

This Post:
11
185811.9 in reply to 185811.1
Date: 5/25/2011 5:07:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I guess what you want to hear is this:
Training D gives one more sound per pound, so to speak. Maybe his value would be the same as if you trained O, but his salary will be lower. and this will make him more valuable.
A buyer will think: Oh, good player and with such low salary!
What is more important though is there are much fewer balanced players, so they tend to cost more.
p.s. Don't forget that IS doesn't increase SF's salary.