you're joking right? Salary isn't a good way to judge players. I think you know this but you still insist on spamming this thread...Yikes!!
I agree, yet here you are in your own post using salary as a measure as well.
any player over 22 and under 10K salary isn't worth saving
I guess I could quote you right back at yourself! But I am not wanting to start an argument, but instead to help the NT move forward. I don't know why you just want to criticise. Obviously salary is an imperfect measure but except for the coach everyone else is looking from the outside and without a long and detailed examination of game statistics that also somehow takes into account the quality of the opposition, enthusiasm used and game shape which I think is really close to impossible, it is the best we have. Please don't pretend otherwise just so you can land an attack on me for some reason.
Also when people talk about Cs with no secondaries I tend to think of those guys you see on the TL all the time with 4 x atrocious etc, not guys that have things like average passing and average OD. If truly he had no secondaries I wouldn't have bought Kouzuki, although the price was such a bargain.
My point is that looking from the outside I am told that the team is weak, that the players there currently are mostly just primary skill based anyway, and that looking just at salaries (come on what other realistic comparason do you expect us to make? Surely not DMI? PPG? RPG? Match ratings?) he would be the 5th top on the team. If a $70,000 allstar potential C (who I doubt will have great secondaries) and a $60,000 allstar potential PF are on the team why can't a $100,000 perennial allstar C be?