BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 3-2 zone

3-2 zone

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
220015.6 in reply to 220015.4
Date: 6/12/2012 7:41:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Depending on your opponents Game shape....if it were higher than yours...sometimes they will break down your zone (figure you out) if they have good experience too

This has absolutely nothing to do with game shape.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
220015.7 in reply to 220015.5
Date: 6/12/2012 9:38:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I nvr play zone, if your sf and pf are no good your going to beat 9-10 times. with all the teams playing LI and up tempo, your going to need a good pf and a vry sf.. I dont know about the rest but stay away from zones..

man to man should work

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 6/13/2012 4:06:00 PM

This Post:
00
220015.8 in reply to 220015.7
Date: 6/13/2012 7:49:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
overall the gain is bigger, then the lose of some weak posessions in my eyes. If the zone match the opponent offense.

This Post:
00
220015.10 in reply to 220015.8
Date: 6/13/2012 4:15:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
i agree if it matches the tatic of the oppents offense but thats a huge crap shoot . Not worth the risk in my small opinion

This Post:
00
220015.11 in reply to 220015.10
Date: 6/13/2012 4:26:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
for most opponent it is pretty easy scouting.

This Post:
00
220015.12 in reply to 220015.9
Date: 6/13/2012 5:14:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Normally play m2m. But needed to hide a trainee on D, so I played 3-2 zone. The opponent played LI.
How come his guards were shooting jumpers against my bigs. I even saw his shooting guard take a long 3-pointer vs, my center midway through possession. Isn't the purpose of zone D to have guards defending the perimeter and bigs the inside?!

(152631.402)

?

This Post:
00
220015.13 in reply to 220015.11
Date: 6/13/2012 11:36:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
your a gm extordinarire lol so i guess it not so hardl.. :)

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 6/13/2012 11:36:20 PM

This Post:
11
220015.15 in reply to 220015.7
Date: 6/14/2012 12:32:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
You are wrong. If your guards have enough ID/SB to cut off drives to the basket, inside shots, passing lanes (this is where the guard's OD is factored a little bit in the game engine), and your bigs have decent OD to defend against jumpers, weird rotations and switch ups on a shot (the bigs ID/SB is factored a little in the game engine, IIRC), then you should be able to run zones without having too many problems. I am really getting tired of all the users that say the zones (especially 2-3) are broken, when most of them haven't put in the effort to have the all defensive skills necessary to run an effective zone. If you want to use M2M, then more power to you.

Last edited by Big Dogs at 6/14/2012 12:33:50 AM

This Post:
11
220015.16 in reply to 220015.15
Date: 6/14/2012 12:40:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Of course im wrong.:) i only spoke for myself not everyone on the game. The success you had is not the success i had when i played it. Also a new user wont have right players to run that . The guy that asked is a new user. He wont have the team to maximize the defense to play it . He will lose 9-10 times playing it. That is what what i said.. So yes im wrong becuase i spoke for myself,

The success you have or had with is not the truth for all.. Neither is my failure and non success... I just spoke from my personal insight with it. A new use will lose playing 3-2. 2-3 more than using Man to man.. agn every team is different to start, so yes im worng with my insight at least Im not telling them, he going win 100 games in a row with it. At least Im giving a honest insight.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 6/14/2012 3:11:01 PM

Advertisement