BuzzerBeater Forums

BB België > U21 National Team Debate Thread

U21 National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Dartreb
This Post:
00
231074.6 in reply to 231074.5
Date: 12/3/2012 6:33:51 AM
Kelmis Spartans
BBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
143143
Second Team:
Eupen Scythe
Thank you very much for your answers. I know that elections are almost to an end, but nevertheless I'd like to ask you one last thing : you both take an example of an inside-strong opponent.

!ngkor goes for 2-3, but Locks seems reluctant at it (you would use it in specifics circumstances). Could you please explain a little further ?

I have had in the past several difficulties playing 2-3 defense, so I'd really appreciate your point of view on the matter.

From: Locks

This Post:
00
231074.7 in reply to 231074.6
Date: 12/3/2012 7:45:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Here we are talking about a much stronger team. They are really strong inside and play most of the time inside tactics ( I imagine).
But that doesn't mean they can't shoot the 3 !!
Almost every time I tried the 2-3 zone, 3pts were raining over me with an insane percentage and I did not see any significant drop of the bigs percentage.
So I'd use the 2-3 only if the ouside scoring of the team is mostly inexistant, wich I think doesn't happens very often at the International U21 level.

This Post:
00
231074.9 in reply to 231074.8
Date: 12/3/2012 12:15:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
In this case my opinion seems to be not the most commonly accepted, maybe even the wrong one, but let me ask this: what would you play in order to stop the Big guys? Man vs Man? If it is a way better team, this option is out of the question, in my opinion. So what would you guys play?

(Btw, I said the opponents C are way better then ours, this means that the outside players are not as good or just as good as ours.)