BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Australia > Draftee's Box Score Analysis RESULTS

Draftee's Box Score Analysis RESULTS

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
257837.6 in reply to 257837.5
Date: 4/12/2014 11:15:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
Interpretation

So, ive made my own conclusions which I would like to share as some discussion starters.
Taking a Myth-busters approach.

The following statement :
Box scores don't mean anything

I personally think ive busted this myth. Box scores DO mean something...... its not concrete, its not 100%, but they do mean something. Remembering that the highest value any stat will have is Respectable, its a scale of 7 numbers. And maybe not every element of the box score means something, but certainly looking at some of those correlations, I will be taking the box score into account with future decisions.

Assists
Really high correlation. obvious. No need for further discussion. EXCEPT FOR......

Turnovers
So we have this high correlation between passing and assists, yet why not a high correlation between Passing and turnovers?

OK thats all im going to talk about now because im tired :) DISCUSS PEOPLE!

Last edited by Coach Regan at 4/12/2014 11:15:58 AM

This Post:
00
257837.7 in reply to 257837.6
Date: 4/12/2014 7:08:53 PM
rimmers
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
463463
Second Team:
Redbacks
its just a shame i cant +1 more than one of your posts per 12hrs. Such a great post to wake up and read!

Ill add that the high stls to OD correlation is exciting to see, since OD is such an important skill to get.

From: Mr J

This Post:
00
257837.8 in reply to 257837.7
Date: 4/12/2014 9:32:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
441441
its just a shame i cant +1 more than one of your posts per 12hrs. Such a great post to wake up and read!

Ill add that the high stls to OD correlation is exciting to see, since OD is such an important skill to get.


Could agree more. Great work coach.

This Post:
00
257837.9 in reply to 257837.6
Date: 4/13/2014 12:14:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Looks all pretty interesting. Have you considered running correlations for a few statistic combinations, like:
Assist to turnover ratio (may be a better indication of passing)
FG% and 3P% (May be an indication of shooting - though since you get higher correlations for FGA than FGM, perhaps not).
Percentage of shots attempted which are 3 point attempts (Could be a good indicator of JR).

One other thing you could consider is maybe running the correlations over groups of players, rather than the whole field. For example, there is a correlation between ID and rebounds, which make sense, because you would expect high ID players to be bigs with more of a chance to get rebounds. Maybe this correlation would disappear if you just ran the correlations for PF/Cs only (if this makes any sense!)

This Post:
00
257837.10 in reply to 257837.9
Date: 4/13/2014 5:37:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
Yes, no, yes yes, no, sometimes and maybe.

when i ran the 3PT% and FT% in excel, i kept getting divide by 0 errors, so I parked that stat, but yes you are right with regards to these things, it is on my list to do.

Assis to turnover ratio - hadn't thought of that, and its easy to do, so ill add that to my list.

I can run the correlations based on the player position. That's also easy to do. and it would be interesting to see if the players classified as C/PF's have a higher correlation for things like ID and RB.

I can also run the basic stats broken down by position as well, but i don't want to go into too much. I think once the data is released into the free world, people can run their own things. :)


This Post:
00
257837.11 in reply to 257837.10
Date: 4/13/2014 8:40:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
+1 Good job mate, taking a keen interest in your findings as I keep a close eye on box scores come draft time. Sorry I couldn't contribute this season but I didn't spend any points... Keep up the good work.

From: yodabig

This Post:
11
257837.12 in reply to 257837.11
Date: 4/13/2014 10:26:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
This is amazing work and must have taken a ton of effort. Reading all those tiny boxes makes my eyes bleed and I am sure you have a much better understanding of the data so what I would look for is something like...

Box Scores
FG%
relationship to JS = High
relationship to JR = Medium
relationship to DR = Medium
relationship to IS = Low
relationship to HA = Low
relationship to anything else = None

Turnovers
relationship to HA = High
relationship to PA = Medium
relationship to DR = Low
relationship to JS = Low
relationship to everything else = None

Blocks
relationship to SB = High
relationship to ID = Medium
relationship to IS = Low
relationship to OD = Low
relationship to RE = Low
relationship to everything else = None