I guess the other issue is that Player A is categorized as a PG while Player B is a PF. Maybe salary is also based on position and not just skills?
I guess the other issue is that Player A is categorized as a PG while Player B is a PF. Maybe salary is also based on position and not just skills?I think this can be it. Also, there is this thing with multi-skilled players having a lower salary, not sure if it applies here or even if it's true. But anyway, if potential really affected salary it should be easily noticeable on the transfer market, yet it's hard to see any difference in a MVP's and bench warmer’s salaries.
Weekly salary: $ 13 610DMI: 58300Age: 19Height: 6'2" / 188 cmPotential: allstar *Game Shape: strong Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: strongOutside Def.: proficient Handling: proficientDriving: proficient Passing: proficientInside Shot: awful Inside Def.: pitiful ↑Rebounding: mediocre Shot Blocking: awfulStamina: mediocre Free Throw: strong
Does this mean we could see salary decreases??!! If you have an amazing monoskilled player that you gradually make more rounded will this lower his overall wage?
no i think he mean it that way, if you train a player monoskills he got more proficient skills, but he could have a lower wage then a player who got one sensationell skill. Weekly salary: $ 13 610DMI: 58300Age: 19Height: 6'2" / 188 cmPotential: allstar *Game Shape: strong Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: strongOutside Def.: proficient Handling: proficientDriving: proficient Passing: proficientInside Shot: awful Inside Def.: pitiful ↑Rebounding: mediocre Shot Blocking: awfulStamina: mediocre Free Throw: strongThis is one of mine players i believe he is cheap ;)But there is also an different whch skill he got high, i know a player who good in handling and driving enourmous skills(16 and 17!), but he just earned around 15k. If you have such skills in jumpshot our rebounding his salarie would be incredible.
Maybe salary is also based on position and not just skills?