BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > 3-2 Zone

3-2 Zone

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
39729.6 in reply to 39729.5
Date: 7/22/2008 7:23:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Perhaps the wording should be changed in the rule section.

This Post:
00
39729.7 in reply to 39729.6
Date: 7/22/2008 10:19:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
I agree that it should be changed.

maybe Higher exterior concentration at the expense of interior concentration.

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
This Post:
00
39729.8 in reply to 39729.7
Date: 7/23/2008 4:32:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
the final team rating is still more varied when combined with different offensive tactics...

when you play any offense with 2-3 you can to a certain degree predict your RB & ID ratings... when you play Motion / Run & Gun / Look Inside with 3-2 you get allsorts of final ratings and I still dont understand why they finish off being worse than if you instructed Man to man..... Im referring here to OD ratings as when i can achieve respectable with Man to Man I then had a Average medium (with near as dammit players / GS etc) when defending 3-2 shortly after.


Again the difference between 2-3 and man to man is a lot easier to forecast.

Last edited by Superfly Guy at 7/23/2008 4:33:49 AM