BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Muted players, purchased to win a CUP/avoid relegation

Muted players, purchased to win a CUP/avoid relegation

Set priority
Show messages by
From: korsarz

This Post:
00
178639.60 in reply to 178639.59
Date: 4/1/2011 2:30:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
202202
players should be on the transfer list for 7 days instead of 3.

3 days is a standard in many on-line manager games, there are many reasons behind that and I don't see why it should be changed.... also I see nothing related to the topic in your post

This Post:
22
178639.61 in reply to 178639.60
Date: 4/1/2011 5:32:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I have read every single post here. The only thing that made the most sense to me is having to pay the salary for 4 weeks no matter what and pushing the deadline back two more weeks for players eligible for playoffs.

This Post:
00
178639.62 in reply to 178639.61
Date: 4/1/2011 6:03:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
202202
I have read every single post here. The only thing that made the most sense to me is having to pay the salary for 4 weeks no matter what and pushing the deadline back two more weeks for players eligible for playoffs.

glad to hear that, those are the two suggestions that seem the best to me too

This Post:
00
178639.63 in reply to 178639.60
Date: 4/1/2011 6:29:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I can see how longer TL period can make stronger interest. Normally it is like that manager want to sell 1-2 players per month if he is really active, so it shouldnt be a problem.

This Post:
00
178639.64 in reply to 178639.61
Date: 4/1/2011 6:33:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I have read every single post here. The only thing that made the most sense to me is having to pay the salary for 4 weeks no matter what and pushing the deadline back two more weeks for players eligible for playoffs.


Pay for services which werent done? Why?

This means only one thing, if I will buy player with high salary (according to the usuall average in my club), I have to keep him very long time, to have any payback. So every high-costed player have to be settled in the club no matter what. So why this should be only about money? Does it have to be like that if I buy center, he has to be here for some seasons everytime?

This Post:
11
178639.65 in reply to 178639.64
Date: 4/1/2011 6:45:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
NO, what it means is that people will only purchase a player for their team if actually makes sense for the team talent wise and economically. This would be for every and any player. Not just high price ones. It will also bring down the amount of day trading. Yes, everyone can day trade. However, not everyone can sit on this game while at work etc. It will make day trading a lot less valuable if they have to pay a salary for that person for 4 weeks. These changes would make the game overall much more competitive and make player better because training would be your best bet.

Does it have to be like that if I buy center, he has to be here for some seasons everytime?
\

We are only saying 4 weeks. Which is about 1/4 of a season.

This Post:
00
178639.66 in reply to 178639.61
Date: 4/2/2011 1:22:32 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11991199
Second Team:
Jirkov
It wouldn't solve the initial problem mentioned in this thread, buying players to help in particular match. But for example leaving strategy for winning the cup would be still possible without any effect of your suggestion.

This Post:
00
178639.67 in reply to 178639.66
Date: 4/2/2011 1:37:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
How does it not? You may purchase that person for that one game but now you must keep him for at least 4 weeks. If you don't keep him the 4 weeks you pay what would be the salary in a lump sum. It will still drastically effect the teams finances.

This Post:
00
178639.68 in reply to 178639.67
Date: 4/2/2011 1:52:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
Because the people buying these players to win certain games like cups or PO finals aren't worried about the money. As long as they don't go so far into debt that they'll bot out, it makes no difference.

This Post:
00
178639.69 in reply to 178639.65
Date: 4/2/2011 2:12:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
NO, what it means is that people will only purchase a player for their team if actually makes sense for the team talent wise and economically. This would be for every and any player. Not just high price ones. It will also bring down the amount of day trading. Yes, everyone can day trade. However, not everyone can sit on this game while at work etc. It will make day trading a lot less valuable if they have to pay a salary for that person for 4 weeks. These changes would make the game overall much more competitive and make player better because training would be your best bet.

Does it have to be like that if I buy center, he has to be here for some seasons everytime?
\

We are only saying 4 weeks. Which is about 1/4 of a season.


Oh, right, sorry. I didnt translated it to myself very well. I thought that you have to pay 4 weeks salary right away. Paying salary in advance creates situations just how I ment them.

For the need to have such player for some period in the team as the obligation, well, what if I buy too high payed player and will not count my finances 4 weeks in advance, does it mean that I have to sell someone else to not go into red numbers?

This sucks too.

This Post:
00
178639.70 in reply to 178639.69
Date: 4/2/2011 2:15:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
As well, what happens to a brand new player that picks up one of these monstrosities? I've seen this happen quite often as a new player hasn't grasped what a 400K salary means to their finances. I've then seen quite a few teams hurriedly sell them off and move on. 4 weeks of salary payment would mean that any new player to Buzzer Beater that makes this not uncommon mistake will almost DEFINITELY be turned off of the game as their team falls apart due to unavoidable debt.

Advertisement