BuzzerBeater Forums

1) I wanna have an homegrown team but with this draft it's impossible; I'd like to have the possibility to spend tons of money but at the same time having the 99% to have a decent drafted player, I don't talk only about skills, I'm referring above all to his potential. Do you think one day the draft will be revised or random will continue to win?

2) there are some tactics that are completely useless. Probably it's also our fault, we didn't understand how to build the roster to play with pressure for example, but if no one understood maybe you should give us an advice in order to use all the tactics we've at the moment

1) Who knows what the future will bring? We're not planning to change it in the short term, though.
2) I cannot teach you to play the game, these things need to figured out on your own. Maybe some tactics really don't work properly, I can admit that as a possibility. We're not perfect, there are definitely ones that function better than others. Maybe we should try to revise that. We'll see, in time, maybe we will.

Is there such a thing,like referees are more willing to give fouls if you play away game,like its somewhere in real life? Home team gets advantage when there is 50/50 balls and less fouls maby,than it would be in away game?

No, I can proudly say that our referees are completely impartial and unbribable.

1. I'm really wondering why friendly games do not produce any income. It's irritating and actually quite absurd, because when being a small team, then money is practically the nr. 1 most important thing because I need to build a solid team and pay my taxes. And when getting knocked out of the Cup I have only home league games that brings income, besides selling players, but that isn't an option for most small teams as they don't have good players. But when friendly games could produce money it would be a way of BIG income over the period of one season which helps teams a lot and maybe make the game more attractive for beginners as they would have more choices and opportunities what to do, who to buy with the money.

2. My second question is have you planned bringing some sponsors that players can choose from. If so, I recommend to look in (removed link) as they have really made the game interesting with those details.

3. My third question is about the in-game motor. I've had games, even just recently, where my player gets hot and then he is subbed out. Could it be fixed because that's just dumb in my opinion
Also there are some other clitches in the game but surely you know them by now from other users.

4. Last but not least, it really bugs me that when I'm away for 20 min or so and I come back, I have to re-log in. I think I understand why it is that way.S o that the game site wouldn't be slow? Anyways I was hoping maybe it can be held to a longer time, the auto log out?

1. Would only home teams get the money or would teams split it? Would the income be a fixed amount or would higher division teams earn more, therefore increasing the income gap between divisions? These are the kind of questions we need to ask ourselves before even thinking about such ideas. It's never simple to add another revenue. It carries a lot of other consequences with it. So, atm, it's not something we're considering.
2. First of all, we kinda frown upon linking to other online games here. Second, thanks for the suggestion, we'll consider it.
3. Hot players need to rest too. They can't play whole matches, you wouldn't like that either, right? I know it's not realistic but if we changed it to keep hot guys in, the weekly minutes could really get problematic.
4. I've been working (unsuccessfully, I must admit) on this issue for a long time. It is a problem inherent in the programming system we're using, so not an easy fix.

Hey marin. Thanks for the bb day thread again

Earlier in the discussion you hinted us about the correlation between rookie free agents skill points and potential I believe

The other thing I would like to get clear is that is there a correlation between age and skill points (example, x age has to be at y skill points to be FA) or is there like a set minimum of points a player is needed after 18 years?

Last edited by tough at 5/6/2015 8:35:28 PM

A few different questions for a few different areas of the game.

1) What concerns do you have about the financial position of a new team now versus where it was a few seasons ago. The market takes swings obviously, and utopia has likely pushed more money onto the market than their used to be. This causes problems moreso now for new owners than before, because before for 300k i could get further as a new GM than i can now. It may take a new team longer to perform well if they start against better managers, and may make it difficult based on the pace of the game and pace of the team building for new owners to remain attached to buzzer beater. could get a moderately young (27-28 year old) Big for 400k that had 40k salary then, now it's probably 2.5 times that cost minimum (1mil) for a quality Big for a lower team to acquire that doesn't have some major deficiency (this is my opinion, and is crude, and some will be cheaper than this and some will be more expensive, but it's an example). Long story short, are you worried about the ability for a new owner to compete giving the finances they have coming in now with 300k in immediate funds and 200k over several weeks of new GM cash?

2) With regards to new owners again, I find that a common obstacle between a failing new owner and a good new owner is the understanding of the impacts of Gameshape and Enthusiasm. I attempt to occasionally contact a new owner and explain how they can better manage these aspects of the game to improve their ability to manage their team, but i feel we could be doing more to improve this area of the explanation of the game so that more may stick around. I don't have any ideas here other than perhaps a rewording of enthusiasm (gameshape is easier to learn by trial and error), but thought maybe passing along my thoughts to get discussion or thinking going on something that wouldn't take too long to fix.

3) Because of the US offsite chat, many times i can see the concerns of other teams, and one such concern was the Transfer List Estimate and the implication of fines being hit or miss. I feel the Transfer policing is inadequate given the current enforcement, and is only acted upon mostly if the users police it, leading to some cases being dealt with unfairly in comparison to the market conditions. Sometimes i feel the user in question has begged someone with money to save him financially and thats not within the spirit of the game, sometimes i feel there is some evidence of 'sour grapes' in the chatrooms and it leads to reports being filed for Transfers that aren't that far out of what i consider realistic. Without pointing out specifics, what do you feel about the TPE and the enforcement overall, and how necessary it remains.

Thanks for your time!

Hi Marin, here is my question.

Neutralizing the dominance of inside based strategies is one of your main priorities for quite some time now as we all know it. What is your plan for dealing with it? Are you planning to fix it just by making some adjustments on game engine or else do you consider introducing some changes on salary formula (let's say charging some skills less or more than what they are now) as you've already done with jump range and shot blocking skills? It seems that you already implement some small changes(on game engine) on a regular basis and stand back to observe their effects. Yet, it looks like it will take more time for you to establish the balance you're looking for(few posts ago you said that the outcomes of changes are less significant than what you expected.).

So, could we expect a new salary formula readjustment in the near future?

Thank you.





Last edited by TrojanEmpire at 5/6/2015 10:13:40 PM

By the way sir, this is one of the best question ask last time. What are your top priorities for the near future?

I'll try to sneak this in while it's still May 6: Are there any plans to create more balanced defensive options? Currently you have a 3/2 zone to combat outside offenses as well as the "extreme option" of a 1-3-1. To combat inside offenses you only have a 2-3 zone which many managers don't even use because for whatever reason, it just isn't effective. Most top level managers simply use a M2M against teams they know will run an inside offense.

I realize the GDP was put in place partially to make LI a little more vulnerable, but outside teams can have that used against them just as effectively as inside teams can. I also realize that it may just be up to managers to figure out how to use the 2-3 zone, however:

1. It seems rough that the only inside defense isn't really effective and
2. It would be nice if there was a inside equivalent to the 1-3-1 to be used as an "extreme option" for inside defense.