BuzzerBeater Forums

Ah but they do.. So again I wouldn't bring it up if it was false. Quick to blame the manager but never want to say maybe we need to do some thing better for the game.. Always blame the manager is the motto.. Its get really old after some time.

I had my youth at 18/19 some 22~24, some older than that. You do the math of were the js/r should be. Btw they did get higher. Some of them were 1500, 2500 to start.

It about skill number that counts not price. it about building to the tactic as well.. You make it sound like pops and training happen like night day , training is slow as hell on this game. SMh



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 3/25/2015 11:17:08 AM

I could pick several parts of that message and contradict it, but that is not the point of that thread. "Help English" has already suffer enough of people trying to make sense of what you say or put sense into you to no avail. So I'll say one word, you will work it if you want. Other people may try to talk with you. Not me, I'm stopping here.

Laughable.

You should have stopped with "I'm stopping here." In a sense you represent BB, since you have EGM before your name. Calling a serious poster "laughable" fails to represent BB in any responsible way. It's certainly true that we all struggle with Mr. Glass' version of the English language and often with his suggestions, but I think anyone who represents BB has a responsiblity to listen and be respectful.

A 35k$ li center is good on this game can compete at every level and be effective . A 35K push the ball pg can not.

Could you tell the people in my league that they only need 35k$ C's? They seem to have missed your research and persist on having guys double or triple (or more) that.

over-inflation of players is the new fad out in BB, hrudey, I hate to break it to you.. It like who care about mr glass research when they can sell it for 800- 1mill or more.

I got the memo along time ago ,to keep my hand out of their pockets. Maybe when I write a volume 2 things will change.

Perpete, you're not a victim here, so playing the victim card won't fly. When you cannot rxhibit courtesy and respect, you don't need to say anyhting.

I realize sometimes I violate that standard, too, I admit it, but I do not represent BB. In my job, in uniform, I represent my employer -- and my own frustrations or ideas have to be put away for a while.

As for the game going down, would it help to present a clear amd logical training protocol? Would anyone actually listen seriously?

He's not playing the victim card, he's playing the equality card in my opinion. Mr. Glass as well as a couple other managers seem to have repeated issues with Perpete for no apparent reason, other than the fact that he gives honest and accurate answers that they do not like/don't comply with their own ideas and opinions. I find myself cringing at the idea of him just letting them send him these absurd forum responses and not say anything, specifically in this forum, where I find myself agreeing with everything Perpete is saying.

but I do not represent BB.

Uh... I will politely disagree with this. Everyone on this game represents bb regardless of regular manager, GM, EGM, Mod, or BB status. Simply because Perpete is an EGM does not mean he should not be able to respond to managers and point out that they are not being reasonable. Perpete and the other GMs and EGMs are not paid for their BB duties, so I think it is unfair to say that they are in job/in uniform representing an employer in BB. They are helping out as a community service and he does a very good job. Maybe calling Mr. Glass' post "laughable" was not needed, but it was accurate and didn't really break any forum rules unless a borderline-edgy response is now against the forum rules.

NOW BACK TO THE MORE ON TOPIC.... WELL... TOPIC

As for the game going down, would it help to present a clear amd logical training protocol? Would anyone actually listen seriously?

I think there are lots of different training protocols on the USA offsite that are very useful, but there is not much guidance on the onsite, and I think more information on training could be really useful! Not sure what exactly could be implemented but I really like your thinking process and I think most people would listen, or at least consider the logical training protocol seriously that you suggested.

Last edited by E.B.W. at 3/26/2015 12:29:12 AM