BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > No Look Inside for a season.

No Look Inside for a season.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
199504.61 in reply to 199504.60
Date: 11/22/2011 5:11:18 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.

This Post:
00
199504.63 in reply to 199504.62
Date: 11/22/2011 5:25:51 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
already prove that 2-3 works.
I'll try to do the other thing on Off Season.

Prove that 2-3 did not work... but please don't use 5 PG or C with no ID

From: FSH

This Post:
00
199504.65 in reply to 199504.64
Date: 11/22/2011 6:03:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
797797
Do you have any consistent prove that 23 is broke ?
Just asking.. I want to know the reason to post later and don't screw it.

Last edited by FSH at 11/22/2011 6:06:33 PM

From: FSH

This Post:
00
199504.67 in reply to 199504.66
Date: 11/22/2011 6:59:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
797797
Yeah i was talking about, 2-3 please explain how is bugged. (You answered that when I was editing)

This Post:
00
199504.68 in reply to 199504.59
Date: 11/23/2011 2:14:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I know in 2-3, your guards have to have a lot of ID because of help defense. Same as your PF and C must have a lot of OD when playing 3-2. The problem is 3-2 is much more effective against outside tactic than 2-3 is against inside. I know it's like this because OD is overtrained and ID is overlooked on guards; but another reason 2-3 is a bad tactic is it lets opponent's outside players score too much from outside. Especially in last few minutes, when the result is tight and players start shooting 3s.
And not only that...2-3 also strenghtens your opponent's offensive flow. So too many cons for little pros.

This Post:
11
199504.69 in reply to 199504.61
Date: 11/23/2011 5:43:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



Last edited by WillFreeman at 11/23/2011 5:47:34 AM

This Post:
00
199504.70 in reply to 199504.69
Date: 11/23/2011 7:39:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.

:D

This Post:
00
199504.71 in reply to 199504.70
Date: 11/23/2011 8:07:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.


I am of the same opinion. By playing 3-2 you put some pressure on outside players, effectively cutting some of their passing power and isolate their bigs on some extent. It's true you lose a bit on rebounding, but this is a minor sacrifice comparing to 2-3's non existing outside defense.


Advertisement