BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
381.63 in reply to 381.62
Date: 9/29/2007 11:38:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Do we have any idea how long it takes to notice the difference. If one skill is two levels higher than the rest? four? etc.

This Post:
00
381.64 in reply to 381.63
Date: 10/3/2007 2:56:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Hi!

I understand 48 minutes is the minimum level for full training, what is the maximum?

The rules state that players get tired if they play too much.
Has anyone had a negative effect from too much time on the court with of your players?

thx

This Post:
00
381.65 in reply to 381.64
Date: 10/3/2007 3:30:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
Definitely there is a negative effect from too much playing time.

The point for perfect training is 48 mins on the court throughout the week (Sat to Fri) this includes the normal league games and scrimmages.

There is no reason to go more than 48 mins. If you go above 90 in a week there is a major negative effect on a player and his performance (in "practice this week"). It can drop a number of levels which can seriously damage a players ability to perform during games.

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
From: achan
This Post:
00
381.66 in reply to 381.65
Date: 10/3/2007 7:33:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
will players train faster if you just train C as opposed to C/PF?

This Post:
00
381.67 in reply to 381.66
Date: 10/3/2007 7:42:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Yes. The more positions you train, the slower individual players will train.

This Post:
00
381.68 in reply to 381.67
Date: 10/3/2007 9:06:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Is it linear? Ie if i train PF/C as opposed to just C will my players train at half the speed?

From: dhoff

This Post:
00
381.69 in reply to 381.68
Date: 10/3/2007 10:25:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I don't think anyone knows the answer to that yet.

From: brian

This Post:
00
381.70 in reply to 381.68
Date: 10/3/2007 10:45:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
do you mean if you train rebounding and one player gets 24 mins at pf and 24 at center, is that different from 48 at center? In, that case the training would be the same.

Edited 10/3/2007 10:49:12 PM by brianjames

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Vikman

This Post:
00
381.71 in reply to 381.70
Date: 10/3/2007 11:23:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
He means if you just train C instead of both C and PF. We haven't be told how much of a gain it would be to train one position. Obviously it will be faster, but how much faster is for everyone to find out

From: brian

This Post:
00
381.72 in reply to 381.71
Date: 10/4/2007 12:04:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I don't understand how the number of positions being trained matters. You could train centers at inside scoring with 2 players or train pf & c, 1 at each position, and have the same number of players being trained. I haven't seen anything to indicate those two situations would be different.

I interpreted the rules on this to only take into account the number of players being trained and the minutes that they play to matter.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: nickfox45

This Post:
00
381.73 in reply to 381.72
Date: 10/4/2007 12:46:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You're right in your interpretation, but where you're getting mixed up is in the number of guys in your example. Training just C should be faster than doing C/PF because you are training more guys with C/PF than with C.

For example, I can easily get 2 guys 48 mins a week at center, or I could easily get 2 guys at C and 2 guys at PF. If the number of guys trained was the same, the training you choose wouldn't matter, but it's not.

Advertisement