BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > B3

B3 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
278646.632 in reply to 278646.629
Date: 9/4/2020 10:17:02 AM
Młoty Stargard
PLK
Overall Posts Rated:
838838
I promise it's last answer
I was winning, so it didn't matter
it mattered after your first win when you wouldn't have access to the B3 otherwise.
B3 is a cost not profit
you just explained you made money even though you shouldn't have if you didn't have free access to B3 in the past...but yeah getting free access to money that others don't is a cost, not a revenue! You can say it's not a massive amount and therefore not a massive advtantage, but it's still 300k cash that none of your league competitors had access to unless they won something.

only four season... (28, 31,33,34)
four season / twenty five season
In every other country, the former B3 champions used this bonus more than I did
accusing me of this is completely pointless, because I use it less than anyone else - you can also accuse the lowest player that he has close to the basket and therefore plays well
Your objection would apply more to any other B3 winner, but I know how many disadvantages there are in playing B3, therefore don't envy anyone
it's more much easier to make money in national cups
you are looking for some strange reasons to hit me and every now and then new nonsense
you gotta do what I do, since you know the way:
stop training, trade the young players, win B3, and use B3 money to keep the high level
I will add from myself that it's important to lose the national cup (I often do this), you did not notice that, so I suggest
greetings





Last edited by darkonza at 9/4/2020 10:21:53 AM

This Post:
22
278646.633 in reply to 278646.619
Date: 9/4/2020 10:19:29 AM
Vilkiukai
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
429429
Second Team:
Vilkiukai II
What i have in min yes, training FTs and stamina sometimes is even more benefitial and value adding than training 85TSP. In first case it making out of mediocre player above mediocre, in second it is just making a mediocre player. What is VORP (value over replacement player) of mediocre one? EXACTLY 0, what is value of mediocre player with good stamina and FTs? Above 0. Thats so simple.

What i want to say, Drakonza said post bellow.
it is about looking for the best path in a given situation, the situation is changing, the strategy is changing

There is no one way to do things, situation is changing and people must adapt, must take decisions, giving most benefits to get some assets. And if the most obvious decision is not to train from young age, and if with that you manage to acomplish something. Then it is good decision, and it is confirmed by results. Every decision has its benefits and
shotcomings.

The best managers adapt, while worse keeps playing in a sandbox withing the walls, their limited minds created, and complain.

There are so many teams playing as long as other B3 standarts succesfull ones. Didnt they had time to work on any strategy you mentioned? Isnt the playing field somewhat equal to everyone? Why does not others teams take "EASY winning strategy"? Who does not let you to take eazy way?

I think the playing field is somewhat equal to everyone, and it is unfair to complain.

Last edited by Vilkai [LTU NT] at 9/4/2020 10:20:31 AM

This Post:
22
278646.634 in reply to 278646.626
Date: 9/4/2020 10:30:50 AM
KS Goldena
PLK
Overall Posts Rated:
40884088
Second Team:
KS Golden Grizzlies
Blaming Darkonza by you for taking profits from winning B3 is ridiculus. Hello...he didn't steal it but won (many times):-). The rules are the rules. The same for everybody. Not only he takes these profits. You have also possibility to take them if you meet particular conditions:-) Well, here's the point...only one user per season win it. I guess it's not so easy:D So I think winners deserved on it. By the way these profits for just participating in B3 are rather symbolic.

Similar with blaming him for not having crystal ball to guess GDP:-) Hello...GDP's guessing is rather lottery (for gamblers:D) than measurable abillity. That's why evaluating quality of BB manager basing on using/efficiently using of GDP is nonsene. By the way avoiding being hit in GDP is also offensive strategy. That's why you can't tell Darkonza felt overconfident. If he felt confident, he would have played his the best LI.

This Post:
11
278646.635 in reply to 278646.628
Date: 9/4/2020 11:02:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Yeah and I have done so while training players, generally for my NT, every single season I have been in D1. From 18yo. You know, that very thing Darkonza says it's impossible to do. And while I was spending tens of millions in trainers and scouting points, I happened to get to the finals a few times (I don't think it's 5 times but whatever). Good for me, it was good for my bank account. I never actually tried to win a title in nearly 30 seasons, not in England and not in Utopia: competing has always been important, but secondary to training. My transfer history tells you all there is to know. That's my choice. In the first season in Utopia, when I made the semifinal in the cup, I was training 5 players. FIVE. I demoted once (despite winning 8 or 9 games) after I had a 2 week injury to a key starter at the beginning of the season and I still trained 3 guards at C.

Some people like the challenge and some people like the easy (and logical, mind you) way to win. Option 1 and 2 are both easy, they only require patience and dedication and nobody is claiming there is a more efficient way to win with the current rules. Training (really training from the ground up) players while continuously competing requires much harder choices and compromises, it is like handicapping yourself both economically and tactically. This is why farm teams exist and people with trainees tank: because competing while training is hard (or impossible according to some). A similar challenge for people who don't train would be trying to compete and win a title while being at or near the salary floor. Does it make sense if you are trying to win? No. Is it more challenging? Obviously. Am I claiming people should play this way? Not really.

Once I am done with Needham in a couple of seasons, I will prove in Utopia how easy both of these strategies actually are. I am tired of this trope. Of course, you can always show everyone you can win by training 2 or 3 players from scratch while staying in D1. You definitely have more assets than me (cash and value embedded in players), so you won't be worse off than me.

This Post:
00
278646.636 in reply to 278646.631
Date: 9/4/2020 11:10:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
users , you are at wrong! Someone like me will succes anyway , if I was in a macro nation I used a diffrent strategy ! My goal was earn B3 and I did it :D
never said that, I only agreed with others it's easier to pull off in a micronation. If you read what I think, I think it's easy to do, so yeah you or someone else can definitely do it even in Italy or Spain. It's just more difficult.

start show others what you can do :D win B3 by your strategy and learn it to us :))
lol I must be speaking a different language. If I were going for the B3 I'd stay at the floor for 10 seasons and then run a higher payroll just like you have done. It is the easiest way this can be done. First I would need to convince myself that spending more time on the game or bore my ass into oblivion for 2 or 3 years to win after that is somehow worthwhile. That's a hard sell.

This Post:
00
278646.637 in reply to 278646.632
Date: 9/4/2020 11:18:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490

only four season... (28, 31,33,34)
four season / twenty five season
so did I say something incorrect? You seem to be agreeing with me

In every other country, the former B3 champions used this bonus more than I did
yes all former champions had and still have that same advantage as you, although it's now limited by WR, not that it matters with the current user numbers. I don't see how it's relevant when I'm talking about the advantage you have over guys who have to qualify, not over others in the same boat as you...

This Post:
11
278646.638 in reply to 278646.633
Date: 9/4/2020 11:40:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
training FTs and stamina sometimes is even more benefitial and value adding than training 85TSP.
more comedy to BB. Now a player with 55 TSP and 10 ST is better than a player with 140 TSP and 2 or 3 ST. Hey look at all these D1 teams winning with a full roster of 55 TSP guys!

Every decision has its benefits and shotcomings.
correct, one of the shortcomings being a braindead way of playing the game with no fun whatsoever. Another being having to spend a lot of time in the game. Another being feeling no challenge and losing interest and eventually quitting. Even mamba from Dyonisus decided he had enough and started training for his NT.

Nobody here is disputing that the paths these 2 guys chose to play the game is the most efficient if you try to win. What I'm disputing is that they are hard to do and that they are fun

Didnt they had time to work on any strategy you mentioned? Isnt the playing field somewhat equal to everyone? Why does not others teams take "EASY winning strategy"? Who does not let you to take eazy way?
because one is boring as hell the other needs time investment and both require to accumulate assets over time. More people in this game train, instead of competing or do both, because they can see their trainees grow. Do you want to fault them or tell them they are worse, just because they can't stomach tanking, doubling or tripling the time they spend on the game or waiting for calendar years to accumulate enough assets? Laughable.

I think the playing field is somewhat equal to everyone, and it is unfair to complain
If I say one strategy is easy or boring or simply requires the time investment, am I complaining? I think I'm simply stating the obvious, but do tell, what or who exactly am I complaining about?

Winning isn't my primary goal, other managers have tried to win not using LI or using high SB teams. Everyone has different goals. Does this diminish Misagh or Darkonza's accomplishments? No, but I reject the notion that their way of getting there is not easy compared to the goals others set for themselves in this game.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 9/4/2020 11:53:11 AM

This Post:
11
278646.639 in reply to 278646.638
Date: 9/4/2020 11:58:45 AM
Spartan 300
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
52555255
Second Team:
Spartan Kids
Why so much hate on B3 winners?
They are awesome, the best of the best!

This is where we hold them!
This Post:
00
278646.641 in reply to 278646.634
Date: 9/4/2020 12:27:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
By the way these profits for just participating in B3 are rather symbolic
he said 300k per season, not me. I think it was actually you who complained when they introduced the sale tax, because you had so many sales that the tax algorithm for you resulted in negative values. And I think it was one of you guys, perhaps you again, who stated openly in the forums: how can you expect us to compete if you take away the 500k/season we make from scamming people with young players? 300k and 500k per season is not irrelevant and besides, due to that tax, the old 500k are now 300k and people still trade youngsters. Why? It's all symbolic, isn't it?

This Post:
00
278646.642 in reply to 278646.641
Date: 9/4/2020 2:44:31 PM
KS Goldena
PLK
Overall Posts Rated:
40884088
Second Team:
KS Golden Grizzlies
You don't know what you are talking about...but let's leave it. It doesn't bigger matter in discussion about B3. Especially that I haven't played in B3 for a long time🙂

Advertisement