BuzzerBeater Forums

I disagree there is team tactical chemistry. if you say not so, then do please explain on how it is not so . I will do the same to counter your rebuttal. On how so
.
You've mis-read , it lead to bankrupt because your always selling to buy. which leads to bankrupt.. Go look were I said "its not always about financally bankrupt", meaning your team wont go any further . Because they lack in team management.

cont.. into further point which may seem off topic.

I hate to sound like a conspiracy maker. But I think we are in A bb economic tactical war.. Since LI/lp are the only thing that sell. I think thats why some got in BB mark, or BB Marmin ear to serve the blow for tactical economic power for profits in favor of these things. Tax exemption is a selling tax which creates vast profits if you trained. It rewards training. This god send for guru trainers & player flippers.

Go look at what being trained the best or created the most. or the easiest... You my call it hording when I say save and don't spend.. I don't think of it as hording I think of it as financial discipline . I find it a tool to fight back versus these type of mangers out here. They will nickel and dime a lot on rare skilled player like run & gun big man for a cookie cutter li/lp player.

The fact is a lot dont know what they are looking at on the market. They Ohh that player is such "crap" big man with almost no reb, all the jr / js. vast ft and to much pa.. No IS very very little id.. oh what a waste of a player..!! Im not going to pay 250k$ for that.. its 25k or forget it. This what they do in the market.

But a cookie cutter li/lp is going 250k-1 mill and he hasn't played 5 game . On top of that I cant buy the good run and gun Big man if I haven't trained. This leads back to tactical BB economics to sell Li/lp players to keep money in their pockets and the market in their favors.. Those other tactical builds, just don't sell well so hy make it is the voodoo they are promoting with very a goods aura.

They want me to put money in their pockets. I will not and alot should not either. Save your money use player advertising to sell/tell what kind of player your selling when you do. create diverse players steer away from Li/lp.

LI greed is killing the market. Jealousy of others success has killed the BB market. A lot see me as public enemy #1 and want my team closed pronto. they don't want the masses to know this stuff, they don't want anyone messing up there BB money or teams long term success. Which is not what im trying to do.

The sad thing bout it all is BB marmin and rest of them will not try to see this as factual because there are so deep in it they cant see the light.. It will be an excuse to counter why the BB market is dead., Look those same guys are asking for more loose training you know why? $$$$.They infuse values like other like myself saying we want outside tactics to work..

Anything to help them make that money, They know for a said fact its too expensive to build a outside team. you will aways go to whats making the money in the market. li/lp controls it. Imo best you can do is save.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 3/18/2015 2:37:50 PM

No such thing in BB.

True, but could be easily incorporated into the fan survey.

If Manager 3 sold the player again, does Manager 1 and 2 get money ? Then Manager 4 sell him, Manager 1 and 2 get it again ? Etc.

Does it help to reduce the inflation or since you make less profit, you try to sell for more ?

I think there is already an online game like that, called Day Trader Roulette.

Personally speaking though, training is what I enjoy, so I would train regardless of how profitable it may or may not be.

The same applies to me. However I recognise that if you want to optimise you'll have to go with the most efficient way. In any case you can make that kind of money only with reasonably high potential trainees who require a higher initial investment. In order to make lower potential training profitable and more palatable to managers the fixed costs associated with training (the trainer) should be lowered some.

I think it's similar to potential, in fact - in both cases anything below about the midpoint of the range is written off as not worth using. I wonder if adding a second dimension to coaching skills that reflects a potential level might work. Something like "Level 5 trainer / all-star proficiency", where the proficiency would indicate what player potential they'd get the most out of (whether as a bonus or a penalty, etc). I would imagine that the proficiency would adjust the salaries of the trainers as well, with massive discounts for levels up to maybe all-star, maybe up to a small discount at superstar, and then increased at MVP+.

Again I agree with what you say, Steve. It would be easier to adjust the staff cost, however let's say they use part of the taxes that are currently being levied on the seller instead? The amounts really are quite small (especially because I held on to all my best trainees), but I usually get pleasure from seeing how my kids are progressing and getting traded in the football game.

I think it's similar to potential, in fact - in both cases anything below about the midpoint of the range is written off as not worth using.

That's exactly right. And contrary to some people opinion, managers came to this conclusion based on rational economic reasoning.

It can be increased, but that would still only concern the financial side of a club, not tactical.

I'm all for team chemistry impacting club performance, but I'm not the one who decide.

Got it. I agree.