BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread....

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread.... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14900.646 in reply to 14900.645
Date: 8/29/2009 3:48:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
557557
Well, I have lost all my faith in buzzerbeater.

Who the hell can explain me this?
(15328404)

Who?????!!!!!!

Tactics are useless, playing at home, E 10 and with the ideal "member of the staff which english name I can´t remember"

Thanks bb, thanks to make this match (and my whole season) a nice piece of wrong code.

PS: 119 points per 100 shots my PG and 3/18, nice :)

This Post:
00
14900.647 in reply to 14900.646
Date: 8/29/2009 3:57:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
My answer seems to always be the same here; offensive flow, offensive flow, offensive flow.

And that seems to be also the reason in my own superfrustrating loss in the semi today..:(((((((((((((( (15290058)

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
14900.648 in reply to 14900.647
Date: 8/29/2009 4:03:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
557557
Offensive flow?? So we should train passing and nothing more :D 4 levels of difference between my outside scoring and his defence and the problem is offensive flow (1.5 levels) and playing at home :S

Well, I´m in blank :(

This Post:
00
14900.649 in reply to 14900.648
Date: 8/29/2009 4:05:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
Well. I don't know, it seems to be important, as everyone who can not understand their loss have lost the offensive flow..

!zazhigai!
From: Marot

This Post:
00
14900.650 in reply to 14900.648
Date: 8/29/2009 6:39:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Obviously u dindt have the best luck in this game, but somehow i think maybe i got some explanation. There were 2 positions which made you lost the game. The PG/SG.

Even if he defended 2-3, his PG seems to be a really good defender and it was on a good shape. Your PG it wasnt on that good shape, and i think he was really good defended even with his 2-3, anyway maybe he had to score 2-4 more points.

After, you used a PF or C to defend their SG, even with his 2-3 i dont think your SG is that good attacking from the outside and even that he was able to do good stats 60% and 1-1 in T3.

So if you count that your PG was well defended and your SG is not that good attacking from outside u got the PG, which scored you 11-22 and 6-12 T3 which are really good stats.

And last but not least he scored you 24 points on the free throw line, thats a huge numer of points. As i said you dindt have good luck, but your attack dindt work and he has a really good inside attack and a good offensive flow. I dont think u lost coz of your offensive flow.

This Post:
00
14900.651 in reply to 14900.646
Date: 8/30/2009 8:05:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
You played a SF as a PG and a SF as a SG. And you expect to win?

Monoskilled Jumpshot Monsters just aren't effective anymore, you should have adjusted before and turned your mono JS monsters into multiskilled effective players.

Your SF played as a PG was completely lost, shooting 3-18 in a outside/mid range focus. You fielded the wrong players for your tactic.

This Post:
00
14900.652 in reply to 14900.651
Date: 8/30/2009 9:07:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
557557
LOL, 119 points per 100 shots the PG and you say this!! If I´ve lost 30 balls I´d realize that offensive flow was the problem but it wasn´t. If the GE could say something I can guess it would say "Sorry, I´ve thrown your season away cause I liked it".

It makes no sense, obviously I wasn´t better in every field of the match, but this is not serious at all. Check everything and think again plase, 3/18 againts 2-3 zone and 119 points per 100 shots is not admissible and 38 out of 87 global is ridiculous!


PS: do you know how my players are?:)

This Post:
00
14900.653 in reply to 14900.652
Date: 8/30/2009 9:19:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
I don't exactly know what your players skills are. But best position "Small Forward" pretty much indicates high jumpshot and lower other skills. If he would have better other skills like handling and passing it would have been Point Guard, and a lot of jump range would have made them Shooting guards.

So yes, I can pretty accurately assume that your players jump shot is way higher than the other skills, which I call ineffective (high salary) jump shot monsters. Also I fail to understand why you field a PF at the SF position to player an outside/mid range focus. Probably purely for defense reasons, but this pretty much indicates the offensive tactic wasn't optimal.

Also your backup PG did shoot terrible as well. When your PG is a monoskill JS monster without good passing, he just missed the oppertunities to pass the ball for a better shot, so the PG will take worse shots than needed. It's just fielding wrong players in the wrong position.

+ you played a slow paced tactic, while you knew your OF would be terrible. That's asking for trouble.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 8/30/2009 9:23:21 AM

Message deleted
From: Phoenix
This Post:
00
14900.655 in reply to 14900.653
Date: 9/1/2009 9:55:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
(15458092)

Did I lose this game because of offensive flow? I had much higher enthusiasm even though playing on the road.

This Post:
00
14900.656 in reply to 14900.655
Date: 9/1/2009 11:07:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
2 reb + 2 TO diference + 8 fouls

and his players Value are so far more powerfull than yours means his team was best in the court

Advertisement