BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy and draft

Economy and draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
182720.66 in reply to 182720.65
Date: 5/14/2011 12:55:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I think this is completely fine. Teams who do poorly have a chance to improve their fortunes with a great draft pick. Why is that wrong? Having 4 million to spend and spending it wisely are two different things, and even if they do spend it wisely and promote, good for them. It only proves that the draft system, namely giving the teams that do poorly an opportunity to improve through getting a great draftee, works.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
182720.68 in reply to 182720.66
Date: 5/14/2011 6:30:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I think this is completely fine. Teams who do poorly have a chance to improve their fortunes with a great draft pick. Why is that wrong? Having 4 million to spend and spending it wisely are two different things, and even if they do spend it wisely and promote, good for them. It only proves that the draft system, namely giving the teams that do poorly an opportunity to improve through getting a great draftee, works.

It is wrong the amount of money that some teams receive for their draft picks,related to overall market conditions,that's all

It should have been improved TPA(not TPE) system,especially the control on young players sells has to be stronger

P.S. the draft system does not work because too few players have value from the draft,in relation to skill/age/height/potential ratio(I still don't understand why 19years old with the same rating of a 18 years old should not have higher skills...)

This Post:
00
182720.69 in reply to 182720.68
Date: 5/14/2011 8:00:32 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Imho a possible solution is to relate the strenght of the draftee to the amount invested (not 5-20k but much more) and all this linked to the divisions, a first division should pay 3m to have the possibility (good possibility) to pick a good young, a six division team should pay 500k, this is an example of course

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
182720.70 in reply to 182720.69
Date: 5/14/2011 8:05:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Imho a possible solution is to relate the strenght of the draftee to the amount invested (not 5-20k but much more) and all this linked to the divisions, a first division should pay 3m to have the possibility (good possibility) to pick a good young, a six division team should pay 500k, this is an example of course

I don't like this at all,it would be impossible to raise to the top divisions for the teams who are in the lower

From: Flamen

To: ned
This Post:
00
182720.71 in reply to 182720.69
Date: 5/14/2011 8:08:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
What about linking good probability drafts to better leagues?

it makes sense that the best prospects sing up for the best leagues.

From: ned

This Post:
00
182720.72 in reply to 182720.71
Date: 5/14/2011 8:18:20 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
The top teams don't need to be favourite. I simply think that if you want a good prospect you've to pay for it and you've to pay following your income, I can't ask you to invest 3m to have a good prospect cause you can't do that

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
182720.73 in reply to 182720.70
Date: 5/14/2011 8:21:22 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
First division, good prospect = 3m invested
Six division, good prospect = 500k invested

If you think the only way to raise is to pick a great young this draft is even worst than I expected :p

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
33
182720.75 in reply to 182720.66
Date: 5/14/2011 1:00:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
I think this is completely fine. Teams who do poorly have a chance to improve their fortunes with a great draft pick. Why is that wrong?


The problem is that your draft result depends 99% on luck. Not on how poorly you did or how well you scouted.

In seasons 13 and 14 I had the first pick in the draft. I scouted and picked the best player in both drafts. Player 1 was sold for 370k, player 2 for 200k.
On the other hand, guys that were picked with low picks are sold for 2+ million.

It's purely about luck. You can do everything right and still not even get your scouting expenses back, or you can randomly pick a player that brings you millions.

That's the problem. There's too much chance involved.

Advertisement