BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Draft

Draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
130923.66 in reply to 130923.65
Date: 2/14/2010 6:04:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Oh well, I'd still rather have this system in place than the current system, even at the slight chance that teams will cheat.

This Post:
00
130923.67 in reply to 130923.66
Date: 2/15/2010 12:38:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Hasn't everyone said the free 14 scoutings happen at the end randomly to preserve a random element? Isn't that when NBA teams step up their scouting, just before the draft with the draft camps, individual workouts etc? That makes a huge difference.

This Post:
11
130923.68 in reply to 130923.67
Date: 12/7/2011 6:20:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
My proposal for a new Draft system.
(I know, I know, it's probably useless)

1) Get rid of "scouting points".

2) "Scouting Reports" can be bought after the all-star break.

3) Scouting Reports come in three types:
3.1 The Basic one has basic information on every draftee (age, height, favourite position, best skill)
3.2 The Advanced one has more information on 10 draftees of choice (all the previous info + an assessment* of all their skills)
3.3 The Focus one gives more info on 5 draftees of choice (all previous info + a better assessment** of their skills + an assessment of potential**)

4) You can't buy the Advanced Report if you haven't already bought the Basic Report, and the Focus if you haven't the Advanced.

5) The whole system should be cheaper than the current one.

6) If a manager doesn't buy at least the basic Report, he will draft randomly, but ONLY low tier draftees can be taken in this way.


* The assessment of the skill level in an Advanced Report means that the actual skill level will be within +2 or -2 compared to the displayed one.
So if an Advanced Report tells me that a draftee has, for example, average OD, it means that his actual OD will be between inept and strong.

** The assessments in a Focus Report will be within +1 and -1.

Thoughts?

Last edited by Stavrogin at 12/7/2011 6:26:13 PM

This Post:
00
130923.69 in reply to 130923.68
Date: 12/7/2011 7:25:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
I also think that the basic "free" information should be much more accurate. Which GM in the world wouldn't know to put Blake Griffin or Derek Rose high up on their draft board? Obviously there should be great rewards for those GMs that do scout to uncover the hidden gems but the complete duds and total studs should be easy to see.

This Post:
00
130923.70 in reply to 130923.69
Date: 12/11/2011 7:01:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
interesting thread.

lets face it though, until the quality of players that come out of the draft improve, i dont think it matters what system you put in place, people still wont invest, because its not worth their time to spend all this scouting money to end up with a 7'1" PG with a $4k salary and atrocious SB + RB and all-star potential.

you can improve the scouting method all you want, but until the above situation improves, its still going to be a long slog and a risky financial investment to find great trainee's in your league's draft.