That already happens, and current policy would apply, that GMs decisions are not to be discussed, hence you can just ignore those cheaters.
we have senior gm who handle it, who would be happy to hear that everybody comes with punishment other people who looks similiar on the first view. And i am quite sure that that will be happen, and people will feel threated unfair, because he can not show the reason why it was cheaper there then here ;)
4 and player try to act in a grey area where the risk is maybe more valuable then the punishment
not sure i follow that point, can you please elaborate further?? thanks
You see what punishment you get for doing X, you also know that you don't get anybody - so maybe you would thing the risk is worth it, and do it.
That already happens, and current policy would apply, that GMs decisions are not to be discussed, hence you can just ignore those cheaters.
which will lead to unsatisfied players, who think that the gm make random/unfair decisions even when they don't know all the fact. and also ignoring them is work, deleting threads, new tickets etc.
Yes, I agree that Pillory more relevant in those games, and more direct impact in those "live" games, but surely if you present more information that leads to less misunderstandings, its normally the other way round, less knowledge, secrecy and lack of information that leads to misunderstandings.
this will lead to much more missunderstanding, i am quite sure because only full information(which cann't be released will give a clear view) so the pillory just give room for suspicions.
People complain now, and chase the GMs all the time, cause there is no entry whatsoever, so the only way to find out is by contacting GMs all the time. While with Pillory you can refer them to the list/entry and make life easier for you guys.
but they have less reason too discuss it ;) And to say here is the pillory is as much work then send out an warning, especially when you had to say that must be on page 23 of it ;)