BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > No Look Inside for a season.

No Look Inside for a season.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: FSH

This Post:
00
199504.67 in reply to 199504.66
Date: 11/22/2011 6:59:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
797797
Yeah i was talking about, 2-3 please explain how is bugged. (You answered that when I was editing)

This Post:
00
199504.68 in reply to 199504.59
Date: 11/23/2011 2:14:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I know in 2-3, your guards have to have a lot of ID because of help defense. Same as your PF and C must have a lot of OD when playing 3-2. The problem is 3-2 is much more effective against outside tactic than 2-3 is against inside. I know it's like this because OD is overtrained and ID is overlooked on guards; but another reason 2-3 is a bad tactic is it lets opponent's outside players score too much from outside. Especially in last few minutes, when the result is tight and players start shooting 3s.
And not only that...2-3 also strenghtens your opponent's offensive flow. So too many cons for little pros.

This Post:
11
199504.69 in reply to 199504.61
Date: 11/23/2011 5:43:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



Last edited by WillFreeman at 11/23/2011 5:47:34 AM

This Post:
00
199504.70 in reply to 199504.69
Date: 11/23/2011 7:39:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.

:D

This Post:
00
199504.71 in reply to 199504.70
Date: 11/23/2011 8:07:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.


I am of the same opinion. By playing 3-2 you put some pressure on outside players, effectively cutting some of their passing power and isolate their bigs on some extent. It's true you lose a bit on rebounding, but this is a minor sacrifice comparing to 2-3's non existing outside defense.


This Post:
00
199504.72 in reply to 199504.71
Date: 11/23/2011 8:40:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.


I am of the same opinion. By playing 3-2 you put some pressure on outside players, effectively cutting some of their passing power and isolate their bigs on some extent. It's true you lose a bit on rebounding, but this is a minor sacrifice comparing to 2-3's non existing outside defense.



Hope these ideas spread rapidly trough B3 teams.

I don't think the extra pressure on guards really pays off the monumental lack of ID you get with 3-2. Altough, if your ID is really lower than your opponents inside attack (this is the case where 2-3 is raped down the rim, without considering the extra assits and better outside scoring), you could say it's better to try 3-2. Since your big mens are gonna be outplayed no matter what, you can at least try to lose with better difference by stoping their guards (playing 3-2 against a decent team with superior inside attack is a lost game in my view).

Last edited by Zero, the Magi. at 11/23/2011 8:42:09 AM

This Post:
00
199504.73 in reply to 199504.72
Date: 11/23/2011 2:37:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Wait, wait...I didn't say I'd exclusively play 3-2 over M2M against LI teams. M2M is still the best option if you want to control who defends who. But if your inside players are stronger than his, I think 3-2 is a smart choice.

This Post:
00
199504.74 in reply to 199504.70
Date: 11/23/2011 4:04:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.

:D


don't forget about 1-3-1 much cooler then 3-2 against my LI ;)

This Post:
00
199504.75 in reply to 199504.73
Date: 11/23/2011 4:23:33 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
Wait, wait...I didn't say I'd exclusively play 3-2 over M2M against LI teams. M2M is still the best option if you want to control who defends who. But if your inside players are stronger than his, I think 3-2 is a smart choice.


I bet you defend M2M my LI... you have no chance.

Last edited by Mod-Infested at 11/23/2011 4:23:55 PM

This Post:
00
199504.77 in reply to 199504.75
Date: 11/24/2011 12:49:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Wait a bit man, first let me build my team and compete with the best in D.I and hopefully B3 one day...and then you will see if I have any chance or not

In the meantime, the best example I can offer you is this:

(39910796)

I normally don't play Low post (I'm a fan of PtB), but I didn't want to give him many possessions by playing a fast tactic and my offensive flow is good enough. Obviously not if you are checking Match ratings only, but that's because I played a 19y old trainee on PG.

Last edited by Koperboy at 11/24/2011 12:50:15 AM

Advertisement