BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > U21 National Team Debate Thread

U21 National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
136134.69 in reply to 136134.65
Date: 3/28/2010 4:22:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but has there ever been a well-rounded SF in the U21s? Or is the decision always between playing a PF or SG at the 3?

Velasco last season was one but they are very rare.

I don't know the current skills of Velasco, but I was under the impression that he was more of a defender than anything. It's possible his height hurt him from being more well-rounded at that age as far as inside skills are concerned (edit: not that that would have mattered at the U21 level, but still), though I don't know how his owner was training him.


Darykjozef <----Correct this time


Much appreciated. It's my real name, after all.

Last edited by darykjozef at 3/28/2010 4:23:31 PM

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
136134.70 in reply to 136134.69
Date: 3/28/2010 5:12:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
134134
In my head I've always ready Darky. Oops.

Smiley was a balanced SF when he was around in u21, right?

I would also pick player A. What I was trying to communicate is that if a hypothetical owner's player looks like player B, a player with slightly lower primaries but enough secondaries to make a difference is more than likely going to be chosen over his or her player. If he wants his player to see the court more, the only option he has it to fix the secondaries.