BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training

Training

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
117949.7 in reply to 117949.1
Date: 11/6/2009 11:16:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i've been training pressure (PG/SG) for like 3 weeks with very little results. what the hell.

This Post:
00
117949.8 in reply to 117949.5
Date: 11/6/2009 11:24:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Oh well thx a lot for all the answers my friend
Hopefully the player I mentioned improved +1Ha +1DR & +1 JS !!!!!!!
I have to mention that he was 19 year old & my coach is level 4

This Post:
00
117949.9 in reply to 117949.7
Date: 11/6/2009 3:41:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Train it single position, its much more effective that way

This Post:
00
117949.10 in reply to 117949.6
Date: 11/6/2009 5:17:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
"Thats wrong for 2 position training its more like 70% of 1 position training not 50%. Theres also a huge drop off if u don't get a player 48 minutes"

Your guessing just like me so how can you say i'm wrong and your correct i know what i said wasn't correct which is why i added that to my post, know one knows the answer so i don't really know why i bothered posting, good luck with your training.

This Post:
00
117949.11 in reply to 117949.10
Date: 11/6/2009 5:37:29 PM
Aussie Pride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
543543
Well the percentages might be a bit off but i am right that training drops off a lot when u don't get a player 48 minutes and that 2 position training trains more then 50% of 1 position training.

This Post:
00
117949.12 in reply to 117949.10
Date: 11/6/2009 7:33:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
"Thats wrong for 2 position training its more like 70% of 1 position training not 50%. Theres also a huge drop off if u don't get a player 48 minutes"

Both of these are likely correct. For that matter, the second statement is definitely correct.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
117949.13 in reply to 117949.12
Date: 11/6/2009 7:38:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
"the second statement is definitely correct"

Okay prove it's correct then.(thanks)

This Post:
00
117949.14 in reply to 117949.12
Date: 11/6/2009 8:02:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Is it more than a 10% drop off for 47 min? If not I wouldn't use the ward huge to describe it.

This Post:
00
117949.15 in reply to 117949.14
Date: 11/6/2009 8:15:50 PM
Aussie Pride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
543543
Well my point was its not linear, so huge might not be the best term but its a significant difference

This Post:
00
117949.16 in reply to 117949.14
Date: 11/6/2009 8:17:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Well I can tell you it is definately NOT a linear relationship between minutes played and training. It is probably closer to an exponential relationship.

i.e. at 48 min you get 100% training but at 36 min this will go down to around 50% training.

You go figure...every minute below 48 min is a significant drop in training % though at 47 min you'll probably get close to full training i'd guess it'll be around 95% or so



This Post:
00
117949.17 in reply to 117949.13
Date: 11/6/2009 8:27:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
"the second statement is definitely correct"

Okay prove it's correct then.(thanks)

You know what, I don't care to prove anything for you. If you refuse to take advice from more experienced players, that's your own problem. It doesn't affect me in any way.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement