BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Specialties

Specialties

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
16415.7 in reply to 16415.4
Date: 2/18/2008 10:54:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I don't like it, this skill would be implemented just like a talent in a special Skill(you train fast because everytraining gives him more power then an similiar player), but you already have various ways to produce a specialist but you could even train players who could do everything their needs(so the players are different already).

This Post:
00
16415.8 in reply to 16415.7
Date: 2/18/2008 3:17:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
279279
Or perhaps a speciality who make the training faster.

For example a Center with ' Free Throw " speciality should train FT 10% faster.
3 pts shooter, should raise in Range 10% faster.. etc..

This Post:
00
16415.9 in reply to 16415.8
Date: 2/18/2008 3:22:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
that would make more sense, because the specialities give no salary bonus, like in this propose but the idea is pretty similiar.

And i still don't like it ;)

From: ZyZla

This Post:
00
16415.10 in reply to 16415.8
Date: 2/18/2008 5:40:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
I really like your idea
(=

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
This Post:
00
16415.11 in reply to 16415.10
Date: 2/18/2008 11:11:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
although i like the idea it is too much like HT and will hurt the TL as rmember we all only need to play 5 people then some subs. Everyone would want a 3pt guy a fast guy a stronger C etc...

i would prefer toknow how many skill-ups my trainer is able to generate over the course of a season and then as the manager choose when and where to allocate these to my team....

From: ffsabin
This Post:
00
16415.12 in reply to 16415.11
Date: 2/19/2008 12:57:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I don't think specialty is needed in this game.

Specialty will only make the already crazy transfers fee higher, and will isolate alot of good players without specialty.

This Post:
00
16415.13 in reply to 16415.12
Date: 2/19/2008 1:26:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
All these comments are really helpful. I like GM-Narcisse's variation on the idea. I can see it working but i can't see it coming in for a while if ever really. It's only a thought. Could be agood feature though if implemented correctly!

This Post:
00
16415.14 in reply to 16415.13
Date: 2/19/2008 5:10:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
For what it's worth, I don't see any benefit to having player specialties. There are more than enough skills available to simulate any of the specialties mentioned in this thread.

This Post:
00
16415.15 in reply to 16415.1
Date: 2/19/2008 7:46:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Enforcer - fouls more, but reduces willingness of opponents to drive the lane.

Go To Guy - Wants the ball late in close games, but sometimes seems as if he doesn't care early on.

Stats Guy - Wants the ball early as he builds his scoring totals, but disappears in crunch time.

Steady Eddy - Plays about the same regardless of the game situation.

Gunner - Fires even when team mates are open.

Cool Hand Luke - May actually play better on the road when motivated by hostile crowd. You want him in the game when the other team is on a 10-0 run.

Home Town Boy - Thinks every road game is a visit to Brick City.

Bulldog - May frustrate opposing players, sometimes causes ejection of both he and opponent.

Showtime - Will try the spectacular rather than the sure thing, but when he succeeds it can ignite the home town crowd.

This Post:
00
16415.16 in reply to 16415.15
Date: 2/19/2008 8:12:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
haha i like those man, great suggestions. Though i detect a hint of sarcasm in some/all of them ;)

This Post:
00
16415.17 in reply to 16415.16
Date: 2/20/2008 1:13:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I tried to think of things that would change how a player used his skills, more than would make a player more skilled.

Advertisement