BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > new managers into lower leagues?

new managers into lower leagues?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Buck4

To: CitB
This Post:
00
18533.7 in reply to 18533.6
Date: 3/6/2008 6:40:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You would be one of the impatient ones in that case. ;-)

This Post:
00
18533.8 in reply to 18533.7
Date: 3/6/2008 8:57:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I've got a question, does a higher league mean higher quality players in the draft? Or do lower leagues get better picks? Or is every league the same level as far as drafting goes.

This Post:
00
18533.9 in reply to 18533.8
Date: 3/6/2008 11:43:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
It's all the same.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: CitB
This Post:
00
18533.10 in reply to 18533.1
Date: 3/11/2008 9:34:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
just to update this, we got 3 of those new managers in our league, the got their teams in the last positions, lost all or most of their games, and now it looks like they do not login no more.

From: Pallu

To: CitB
This Post:
00
18533.11 in reply to 18533.1
Date: 3/12/2008 10:15:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
Are third division teams stronger than fourth division teams? Basically most of the teams in III and IV started at the same time, no?

Nevertheless I would prefere new teams to start in lower leagues as well. It is financially an advantage to start in III for new teams, therefore not balanced.

Insert new teams low, replace at the end of the season voids with better teams from lower divisions (like in the past).

From: CitB

This Post:
00
18533.12 in reply to 18533.11
Date: 3/12/2008 12:01:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
maybe its random, but we have 5 leaguelevels in germany, so i was thinking they might could change that and put them to lower ones, it makes no difference for me and the others from my league, but maybe for them. just to give them a easier start.

From: Pallu

To: CitB
This Post:
00
18533.13 in reply to 18533.12
Date: 3/12/2008 12:17:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
I definetely agree with your proposition, I was only adding different reasons...

This Post:
00
18533.14 in reply to 18533.13
Date: 3/12/2008 2:20:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i think that if new teams go to lowers division they will probably get a division of mostly bot teams and maybe that will take the enthusiasm of a new player..

From: Pieriku

This Post:
00
18533.15 in reply to 18533.11
Date: 3/12/2008 6:24:28 PM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
They started at the same time, but the DIII will get more money from the attendance, so more money to buy better players and hire a better staff. I started in DIV in my country, and it was really hard to get a balanced budget at the beginning.

From: Pallu

This Post:
00
18533.16 in reply to 18533.15
Date: 3/12/2008 6:37:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
@ Tiago Barradas: yes, that is indeed a downside. But it's that or getting crushed like others fear. At the end of the day it is up to personal preferences of the new manager which "problem" to prefer.

@ Pieriku: correct. But therefore it is so annoying to see new teams being put in div. III whereas the two of us still struggle in IV after quite some time... ;-)

This Post:
00
18533.17 in reply to 18533.14
Date: 3/12/2008 7:11:08 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
i think that if new teams go to lowers division they will probably get a division of mostly bot teams and maybe that will take the enthusiasm of a new player..


not as much as entering a league mid-season with a record of 1-8 playing against teams much stronger then a newly assigned one

Advertisement