BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Where did the money come from?

Where did the money come from? (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
Message deleted
This Post:
00
185772.8 in reply to 185772.5
Date: 5/24/2011 6:49:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
Now that I look again, it was probably closer to a season and a bit that before his first transfer. I'm not sure if that was enough time to put away almost $3 million but if he didn't spend on the draft, transfers, arena and cleared out all his salary, he might have been fairly close to that figure.

This Post:
00
185772.9 in reply to 185772.7
Date: 5/24/2011 6:50:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
If he inherited a good trainee he could have trained him, sold him and sold another for about 2 million. Then he could have saved the rest of his income.


OMG lol. How about you check the link? HE DIDN'T SELL ANYONE FOR 2 MILLIONS, SHERLOCK. And income? He had 2 home games before 3 million spending... 1,5 mil per home game... Yep, that must be it...

Really, wunderkinds :)

This Post:
00
185772.10 in reply to 185772.7
Date: 5/24/2011 6:50:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
If he inherited a good trainee he could have trained him, sold him and sold another for about 2 million. Then he could have saved the rest of his income.


This isn't the answer because there's no such trainee on his transfer history before he spent the $3 million.

This Post:
00
185772.11 in reply to 185772.5
Date: 5/24/2011 6:54:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
Sorry, I think we both misread your post. You're saying back in 2010 he spent all that money.

Based on my math, he played about 2 seasons before he made his first transfer. Perhaps he was tanking and saving up his cash?


What math is that? Can you read? He played only 2 weeks then made that spending. Not 2 seasons, no trainee, no nothing...

This Post:
33
185772.12 in reply to 185772.11
Date: 5/24/2011 6:59:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
Sorry, I think we both misread your post. You're saying back in 2010 he spent all that money.

Based on my math, he played about 2 seasons before he made his first transfer. Perhaps he was tanking and saving up his cash?


What math is that? Can you read? He played only 2 weeks then made that spending. Not 2 seasons, no trainee, no nothing...


Can you agree that just because he made his first transfer on a certain date, that doesn't mean it's the same point in time that he joined BB?

It says that he joined in season 11 but my math says that he made his first transfer in season 12. Count back 14 weeks a season yourself, see what season you come up with for March 2010 and stop being such a complete jackass.

This Post:
00
185772.13 in reply to 185772.12
Date: 5/24/2011 7:06:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
Can you agree that just because he made his first transfer on a certain date, that doesn't mean it's the same point in time that he joined BB?

This is correct. But the team before him called narodno didn't have the same players as him. So he didn't just renamed the team. His first game was on 13.3.2010. I thought of that.

It says that he joined in season 11 but my math says that he made his first transfer in season 12.

That's correct. Now check the season 11 and tell me if he started playing at the beginning of that season...

I wouldn't be complaining about this if I didn't study it. And since you didn't, almost all of your explanations are superficial. The best answer you gave is about clearing the expences. Although even that's pretty impossible.

From: Johnson

This Post:
22
185772.14 in reply to 185772.1
Date: 5/24/2011 8:47:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
He played his first game under that name on 3/14/2010. You start with 300k and are given 200k extra over the first four weeks. He made $324 700, before tax, in transfers in his first week. He played two home games before he bought the first group of players. So he would have had about $1 million to spend at the most, which doesn't add up.

The only explanation I can think of is that some of his transfers have disappeared. I think I read somewhere that if a player becomes a free agent their previous transfer history is sometimes erased.

From: ibarix

This Post:
00
185772.15 in reply to 185772.14
Date: 5/24/2011 8:53:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
The only explanation I can think of is that some of his transfers have disappeared. I think I read somewhere that if a player becomes a free agent their previous transfer history is sometimes erased.


Let's suppose he sold a guy for 2 millions. The player becomes retired. Which history might be deleted? I think players history, not transfer history of the team he was in. Right?

From: ibarix

This Post:
00
185772.16 in reply to 185772.14
Date: 5/24/2011 9:17:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
The only explanation I can think of is that some of his transfers have disappeared. I think I read somewhere that if a player becomes a free agent their previous transfer history is sometimes erased.


Bingo. We have a winner. Apparently it was all just a big bug (BB). This player http://www.buzzerbeater.com/player/13499908/history.aspx was on his team from the start but was not shown in the transfers. Last game this player played for udruga was on 6.4.2010. http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/21268001/boxscore.aspx. On 8.4. he played for his new team ZKS Stal Stalowa Wola http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/22439358/boxscore.aspx. Even players' transfer date is incorrect. It says he was sold on 13.1.2011. But according to the manager he was sold between 6. and 8.4.2010. Since he was MVP draftee, he was sold for big money. The player did become free agent afterwards so his transfer disappeared from both his history and previous owners transfer history.

Mistery solved...

GOOD JOB, REBEL

Last edited by ibarix at 5/24/2011 9:22:43 PM

Advertisement