BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > U21 National Team

U21 National Team (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
20167.7 in reply to 20167.6
Date: 3/29/2008 5:04:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i think it shoud be U20..

This Post:
00
20167.8 in reply to 20167.7
Date: 3/29/2008 5:09:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
i think it shoud be U20..



Reasoning?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
20167.9 in reply to 20167.8
Date: 3/29/2008 5:17:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i dont have any good reason..

This Post:
00
20167.11 in reply to 20167.10
Date: 3/29/2008 5:26:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
and balanced de diference


portuguese? :p

i agree..

This Post:
00
20167.12 in reply to 20167.9
Date: 3/29/2008 5:27:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
IMO U-20 or U-21 are better than U-19.

U-19 depends just on random. You have to wait for the draft and than quickly search for players. NTU19-manager can´t work with NTU19, can´t build the good base for team.
On the other side, if you could have player in the team 2more seasons, NTU21-manager can better manage things around the team.

IN U-19 the random factor will rule. In U-21 NT-manager can better show his abbilities to manage NTU21.

From: lwk

This Post:
00
20167.13 in reply to 20167.12
Date: 3/31/2008 1:59:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Especially some of the draft players are 19 years old instead of all of them are 18.