BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Limit Switching of Defensive Assignments - +1

Limit Switching of Defensive Assignments - +1

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
204488.7 in reply to 204488.6
Date: 12/13/2011 8:13:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
The game forces us to play players at pg or c to single position train


Thats the issue. Creating a change to tactics as a roundabout way to solve that issue just creates more issues.

Different solution needed.


Ok, then remove defensive switching altogether. How it works in BB is not how it works in real life.

I like limiting def assignments as a practical solution.

Last edited by brian at 12/13/2011 8:15:39 AM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
204488.8 in reply to 204488.7
Date: 12/13/2011 8:42:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Ok, then remove defensive switching altogether. How it works in BB is not how it works in real life.
(203686.9)

From: brian

This Post:
00
204488.9 in reply to 204488.8
Date: 12/13/2011 8:48:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
or:

you're saying that i can force Bogut to guard Westbrook in iso

edit - and im not sure why your confusing a point forward with a point guard. does the GE allow us to see who brings the ball up the court and runs the offense? as you can see from the ceska/italy game, it appears that a pg playing at c was running the offense. your example doesnt support the need for def assignments.

my example above is much closer to what can be done and would not happen in real life.

Last edited by brian at 12/13/2011 8:55:03 AM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
204488.11 in reply to 204488.10
Date: 12/13/2011 3:42:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i think your suggestion would make sense, but to change the difficulty in the middle of the game at one game element could cause trouble in my eyes.

Even when you don't have to necessary forfeit games for it.

From: brian

This Post:
00
204488.13 in reply to 204488.12
Date: 12/13/2011 6:52:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I dont think the use of PG's aso out of position is that widely spread so that we need a fix to it.


So make a change in the future so ppl will complain "i planned my team around this and now you are ruining my plan!".

Ignoring it is how it becomes a bigger problem.

Last edited by brian at 12/13/2011 6:52:38 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: brian

This Post:
00
204488.15 in reply to 204488.14
Date: 12/13/2011 7:04:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
A good number of the best managers in the world run LI. I get that you want to blow this off, point taken. I think thats a bad idea.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
204488.17 in reply to 204488.9
Date: 12/13/2011 8:26:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
You can always play zone.
as you can see from the ceska/italy game, it appears that a pg playing at c was running the offense.
By your logic P.Fanesi was running Italys offence. I see everyone but the PG "C" dissing out assists. As you can see the PF playing at PG is actually a pretty good passer. Hostivar is known for his weird tactics, but he has always had great all around skilled players. If you think this is a great tactic, try to use it. You will mostly lose those games though.
This option was added to make training a bit easier. A lot of managers wanted this change and feel it was an improvement to the system. I never had a problem with the old system, but the current one seems better. Perhaps disallowing the use of defence assignements for NT's?
I don't see this as a big problem. This can be countered with zone defence (the new box one aswell). Usually these games end with a loss for the testing team. What's the difference who scores those baskets? The end result is what matters.

Last edited by Kukoc at 12/13/2011 8:28:29 PM

Advertisement