When a player is playing at a better league, he gets more money.-- --The salary should be affected by the division (and maybe league) a player is being signed to.
That's why all of the draftees in NBA except four Ot dive ask to play in D-League, because they know they will be a key player there.By the way it would encourage a form of tanking if you know that your best players will cost less in lesser leagues, you can keep some of them there.Worse, farming will be easier and encouraged if very good players don't cost a lot in low divisions.
True. Relegation is alot less scary if my players don´t demand their full wages in the lower league.
You have a strange way to look at thing that is for sure.
I have never seen a team in a lower league holding Lebron, Howard and Bryant and paying like they will pay them in an higher league.Period.
So, you suggest that teams in tiny leagues (say, Venomous Scorpions) should get their players cheaper than teams in big leagues (say, all NBBA or ACBB teams). Why? Or is the idea something else?
When a player is playing at a better league, he gets more money.-- --The salary should be affected by the division (and maybe league) a player is being signed to.So, you suggest that teams in tiny leagues (say, Venomous Scorpions) should get their players cheaper than teams in big leagues (say, all NBBA or ACBB teams). Why? Or is the idea something else?Just adding some new variable for the sake of "added realism" or whatever does not seem useful if there is no clear game-play justification. Added realism can be reason enough if there is no game play change, however this suggestion clearly introduces a significant change.