BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > TEAM development and franchise players

TEAM development and franchise players (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
271102.7 in reply to 271102.5
Date: 6/21/2015 1:08:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Playing in actual games is an element/aspect of player development.
... rewarded in this game by increases in Experience, as it should be.

example- Guys like MCW who play big minutes as rookies tend to develop quickly and establish a career.
They develop quickly because they have so much talent, not because they played more minutes.

Have you ever even been part of a coaching staff???
Actually, I have been on a coaching staff and head coach as well. That this is true of you or me is irrelevant to this discussion.

In short, minute requirement is realistic.
Nope, sorry.

If all you do is press your argument over and over and over again, the conversation is not elevated.

This Post:
00
271102.9 in reply to 271102.8
Date: 6/21/2015 11:10:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
You're entirely missing the point, probably deliberately but maybe not.

Rookies develop because of their skills. They gain experience because of their minutes played. That isn't rocket surgery.

And your usual ad hominem attacks are hypocritical and entirely out of place.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
271102.16 in reply to 271102.14
Date: 6/22/2015 10:16:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
I agree that players develop through playing time in the NBA and even in Europe. They set the threshold at 48/week but whatever the number I agree with Trainerman that there is correlation between burn and development. I'm fine to retain that aspect of the system to some extent as long as we get more flexibility.

My point is that we already have that in logical form -- Experience. There is no need to retain it in illogical form, such as requiring out-of-position playing, or completely failing to train players who get minimal or no minutes.

Advertisement