He was unlucky. But there is more than match ratings, shots and CT. I guess frency would often win this match as well, but the PF and C of constantinopel are great players and might very well have extremely good defensive stats which makes frency's inside tactic a lot weaker. Frency had to rely on his SG and Sf for the points while playing inside....whcih can work but may not.
(6383282)I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug. I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?I just see a game where the team with the best team ratings, and the only team who tried, lost. Which is illogical. That's something wrong, also because the team ratings and the points per 100 shots speak about two different matches.
(6383282)I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug. I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?
(6383282)I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug. I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.
PS however, I don't think it's a bug, but we have to tell the truth: Frency was very unlucky and we can't assume that the result of the match is right..
(6383282)I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug. I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?I just see a game where the team with the best team ratings, and the only team who tried, lost. Which is illogical. That's something wrong, also because the team ratings and the points per 100 shots speak about two different matches. Team ratings might give you an idea about how strong a team is, but they are not foolproof. Likewise, CT with very low enthusiasm is not much better than a Normal.
enthusiasm 8 is very low??!
Again, points per 100 possessions is strictly what determines the game outcome.
Again, points per 100 possessions is strictly what determines the game outcome.Do not forget Reb, FT (fouls), TO and BLK.
enthusiasm 8 is very low??!I'm pointing out possible reasons, not delivering judgment about what the enthusiasm actually was.Again, points per 100 possessions is strictly what determines the game outcome. If they were identical to team ratings, then it wouldn't make sense to have both of them.It is obviously not up to me to decide whether there was a bug or not. But 'there must be a bug' is not necessarily the only explanation for the situation.
There must be a bug was only a provocation..