BuzzerBeater Forums

Canada - I.1 > BC Törööö Rookies Thread

BC Törööö Rookies Thread

Set priority
Show messages by
From: jbmcrock

To: RiP
This Post:
00
80797.7 in reply to 80797.6
Date: 3/18/2009 8:11:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I'm curious... is there a priority list for these guys? In terms of training I mean.

Not really - they should all be able to train fruitfully. However, at the moment I am looking to ensure those with lower od get the 48 minutes because they are tending to foul out, which is throwing the training plans off. I am hoping that when Fritzer improves a bit more in od, he will refrain from committing 4 fouls in a span of about 5 minutes against a $4k guard.

This Post:
00
80797.8 in reply to 80797.7
Date: 3/20/2009 8:25:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Training results:
Coach: Level 6
Trainings:
Week 1 - pg pressure: Braier (48 minutes) to respectable od, Fritzer (29 minutes)
Week 2 - pg pressure: Braier (46 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes) to mediocre od
Week 3 - pg pressure: Braier (46 minutes) to strong od, Fritzer (48 minutes), Thomas (46 minutes)
Week 4 - pg pressure: Braier (33 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes) to average od, Thomas (48 minutes) to average od and respectable handling

Minutes were thrown off by Frtizer's decision to commit about 4 fouls in 5 minutes. Hopefully Fritzer and Thomas don't have the dreaded hidden "foul" trait.

This Post:
00
80797.9 in reply to 80797.8
Date: 3/27/2009 11:10:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Training results:
Coach: Level 6
Trainings:
Week 1 - pg pressure: Braier (48 minutes) to respectable od, Fritzer (29 minutes)
Week 2 - pg pressure: Braier (46 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes) to mediocre od
Week 3 - pg pressure: Braier (46 minutes) to strong od, Fritzer (48 minutes), Thomas (46 minutes)
Week 4 - pg pressure: Braier (33 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes) to average od, Thomas (48 minutes) to average od and respectable handling
Week 5 - pg pressure: Braier (48 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes), Thomas (47.4 minutes) to respectable od

Only pop was the second od pop in a row for Thomas despite not playing a full 48 minutes this week - while two straight weeks without a pop from Braier. Maybe there is the secret in-country training bonus that Charles has neglected to mention? I imagine that height is probably the culprit.

After 5 weeks, I am quite surprised that there has been only one secondary pop. I am encouraged by Blacksword's training speed report on passing, seems that it is likely a good deal faster than od training.

This Post:
00
80797.10 in reply to 80797.9
Date: 3/27/2009 12:18:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
What is your take on the importance of training passing? If Blacksword's report is right then it seems to have a better rate with the secondaries, but I am having a hard time justifying spending time on passing.

A season or two ago I significantly improved my PG passing through signings and I could not really detect a difference in team performance. I can take that as either a) there was no real improvement, or b) I have no real ability to detect the improvement.

Although perhaps it could be justified on the secondary pops alone.

This Post:
00
80797.11 in reply to 80797.10
Date: 3/27/2009 12:29:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I haven't noticed too many differences with passing other than a higher number of assists. That said, the highest I have currently is proficient, so it's hard to really know (I had a sensational ages ago, but can't really make any judgments since team level and competition are so different). In fact, back in season 5, I started several B3 games with three atrocious passers. I would assume that it helps improve looks, and with my team's low shooting percentage, am sure it can't hurt. Of course, the next time I train passing will be my first week ever doing so.

As far as the secondaries, Blacksword's data is insufficient to identify quicker secondary pops as he has not had players achieve multiple secondary pops yet.

This Post:
00
80797.12 in reply to 80797.11
Date: 3/27/2009 3:35:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Yeah upon rereading his information I see that I misread it.

I really cannot decide whether or not to train passing. I haven't in the past, but I keep wondering if I should try it.

Any thoughts Oueftete?

Last edited by TigerUnderGlass at 3/27/2009 3:36:19 PM

This Post:
00
80797.13 in reply to 80797.12
Date: 3/30/2009 3:37:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
I believe it is something to consider - especially with the annoucement of changes regarding TOs and AST next season.

Next season Im starting guard training and will be my focus.



This Post:
00
80797.14 in reply to 80797.13
Date: 4/3/2009 8:18:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Week 1 - pg pressure: Braier (48 minutes) to respectable od, Fritzer (29 minutes)
Week 2 - pg pressure: Braier (46 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes) to mediocre od
Week 3 - pg pressure: Braier (46 minutes) to strong od, Fritzer (48 minutes), Thomas (46 minutes)
Week 4 - pg pressure: Braier (33 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes) to average od, Thomas (48 minutes) to average od and respectable handling
Week 5 - pg pressure: Braier (48 minutes), Fritzer (48 minutes), Thomas (47.4 minutes) to respectable od
Week 6 - pg pressure: Braier (47 minutes) to proficient od, Fritzer (48 minutes) to respectable od, Thomas (48 minutes)

Through 6 weeks of training, neither Braier or Fritzer have improved secondaries - I might have to train handling after all.

This Post:
00
80797.15 in reply to 80797.14
Date: 4/3/2009 8:26:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
You should post on the Bugs forum that Pressure training is broken because it's not training secondaries, and make my head explode.

This Post:
00
80797.16 in reply to 80797.15
Date: 4/5/2009 3:12:06 AM
Molson Canadians
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
You should post on the Bugs forum that Pressure training is broken because it's not training secondaries, and make my head explode.


Don't forget to bump the thread regularly or start other threads that point to it! Also, use Global-English, because the Bugs forum is clearly for *other* people's bugs. It might also help to send a BB-Mail duplicating the content of your thread to all the BBs and GMs, because then they're more likely to read it.

(I hope this gives you an idea about the types of BB-Mails I get. Also, some of the wonderful replies to my "Please use the forums instead of contacting me directly" Press Release:
1) "Check out my bbmail that I sent to you"
2) "we will use the forums!!!"
3) (one that got deleted which was also funny, but I forget what it said))

Advertisement