BuzzerBeater Forums

Right now the FA system is set to deflate the economy ONLY for vet top teams,exactly the teams taht have all the money in the bank.

Which teams are you talking about here? Top tier teams need to spend in order to be competitive. If you try to save money, you will not make playoffs. So renting a player is a problem for those non competitive DivI leagues. I'm guessing you base this "money in the bank" on your own team. I've always been trying to unload the reserves I have. Eventually being able to get to DivI. It's not easy to get back to DivI after relegation. Your economy suffers greatly if you demote. A bunch of the managers relegating (even after they have promoted to divI) have quit because they can't seem to get back over that hump.
I don't see what you win with setting FA price higher than 1mil. If the player is good he will sell. Atm the price of good enough players for divI flucktuates between 1-3 mil (gret players go over that). Even if they would rise it, I would not mind. Crappy high salary players still retire with 1mil initial price. Yes, I have seen it happen! Great NT players never go cheap. You can't get a great NT player for 500k. You can get an unbalanced salarymonster for 500k. Examples of great players and their recent price (8189609), (9573625), (8189630), (10942461), (12436072), (8189968), (10941691).

For the new accounts and lower salary palyers there is no FA, that doesn'T help with deflation for most users!!!!

I am mentoring two divIV level teams. The TL is full of players to choose from. The market is fine there at the moment. A lot of managers are training and the flow of new capable players arives every draft, it's reasonable to raise the the salary ranges for FA's.
Perhaps my demands to a player are too high, I seldom come across a player that is tagged FA in my 3 saved searches. If I do however, they never go below 1,5mil. I think your petition has something to do with your own recent rent a player for championship run. It's great that you have some extra cash, but you can't expect to draw the same price, while selling your salary monsters at the start of the season, compared to their price right before playoffs.
We are prolly playing in a different world all together. I just can't see the top teams making enough money to raise the high demanding salary player prices.

My two cents:

Players whose salaries are high should be more expensive proportionately than players with smaller salaries (relative to position obviously). From observing the TL, some players (similar ages) whose salaries say 200k, they can sell for 400k. Whereas players with 25k salary can also go for 400k.

To me, that is an imbalance that I would like to see worked on.

Perhaps you could take their weekly salary as a part of their transfer price. Say a player with 200k salary bought at 400k, costs you 3,2mil a season. While player with 25k salary bought at 400k, costs you 750k a season. That's a pretty big difference, wouldn't you say?

Take a vote here:

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

This is just on tanking, but it's still something.

Not the place for reporting possible illegal transfer.

Last edited by GM-Perpete at 6/1/2012 9:03:30 PM

What about minimal price for players to balance market.
For example: Minimal price=Salary X 20.

And one more idea: MAX price for draftees.

What do you think ? + / - ?


Last edited by FenXas at 6/2/2012 2:53:50 AM

But you are talking about nowadays situation. I am not :)
And "20" isn't constant ;)

Last edited by FenXas at 6/2/2012 3:33:30 AM

But you are talking about nowadays situation. I am not :)
And "20" isn't constant ;)

buy he and show good way for all managers:)

You are wrong again. I m talking about possible tools but not about behavior :)