When I build and and analysed Haek, the better he got, the more the engine tried to evade him. The big besides him got more and more actions to defend and had more blocks.
So if I understand correctly, since haek was the initial target of the engine (let's say in the first 15 minutes), opponent got more shots against him, resulting in shotblocks , after that the opponent's coach shifted the shots to your other big guy who made shotblocks on his own even though his SB was not high? or because haek helped him alter the shots because he was constantly improving in SB & engine tried to avoid him after a 15 minutes time out for example?
I'm trying to understand the timeline/scenario of your other bigs increasing their shotblocks even though their SB was much lower than their ID
It is more a general topic and not bound to the first minutes.
Your oppenent starts his play. They run the offense and search for a high % shooting spot.
Haek took away such spots. The other big was compaired to him the better option.
Example:
Against Haek you would have 20% of success, against the other one 40%. So you try it against the other one.
In the end Haek had ID18 and SB19, my PF had ID13 and SB14 and was the weak spot in the paint.
When both were more or less at the same level, both had around 10 defended shots per game.
With ID16 and SB16, Haek had around 13 defended shots per game. The PF dropped to 6.
But with ID18 and SB19 Haek dropped to 7 defended shots per game and the PF went up to almost 15.
It ended even with the point, that two different bigs from me, won the #1 worldwide in blocks at the end of a season. But non of them was Haek.
The offense saw two mismatches.
One against Haek, which was good for me and one against the PF, which was "good" for the opponent.
I am sure, if my PF had ID13 and SB16+ at that time, he would be a better blocker and get more blocks.