Of course, but you're talking here on a perfectionist point of view. Which in reality never happens. Besides yeah the more money they have the more it is going to waste. I feel you're trying to poke holes in my logic just to discredit instead of actually trying to understand and help.
I'm not insisting on this talk because I'm looking at this from a NT perspective. I'm looking for a club team perspective as well. And I've spoken to many Moldovan teams, one of them was a mod of this game many seasons ago and another was -Defenders-, a BBB champion. We all reaalized these issues are what affect their game enjoyment. We've managed to attract 4 more users for Moldova which quite frankly is a miracle. That's almost 50% increase on the Moldovan userbase.
And almost none of these users have their club teams as an objective, most of them try to build Moldovan players for the future. But not only most of them are new to the game and cannot manage their teams well but they also have no knowledge of how draft and training works. And when there are no available players for these kind of managers they simply give up on the game, maybe checking once in a while, maybe completely fading away.
And this issue is very common among micronations users, macronations users have very competitive leagues whereas micronations leagues are basically devoid of any fun because the quality and experience between managers is very very big. But moving on.
Let's assume a real example. And if you check by yourself the majority of teams and leagues in BB you'll witness this as well.
Truth is only 5% of micronations users will invest well in staff, infraestructures, players and actually develop these players for the next 6/7 seasons.
But due to macronations communities it is easier for those macronation users to obtain information, so even in III. leagues you will have teams racking up to 150k per week in profits. Which then makes your point of micronations users making more money completely useless. Right?
So you can assume more than 10% of users in macronations will manage their teams near perfectly. But for the example sake let's assume 10%
10% of for example 700 users would be 70 teams managing this perfectly. Minimum of 3 players being trained for their u21/NT/Team for 6/7 seasons would be 70*3=210 players in the span of 6/7 seasons being completely fit for their NT.
For 500 users this would be 50*3=150 players.
For 150 users this would be 15*3=45 players.
For a micronation though?
For 15 users this would be 1 user doing this perfectly. 1*3 = 3 players trained for the NT after 6/7 seasons.
For 50 users this would be 2 or 3 users doing this perfectly. 3 users * 3 players = 9 players for the NT after 6/7 seasons.
Once again I ask you, do you think this is fair? Besides some rare exceptions like Malaysia and Korea that took more than 10 seasons to build and a shitload of thought and planning and consistency and effort.
Final thought and I'll repeat this again
How is it fair that even with the utopia micronation drafting we've only seen on the transfer list players from 2 micronations country (Pakistan,Moldova) ONLY 1 player with NT potential on the transfer list? Compared to a minimum of 30 for italy, polska, china, spain, etc etc.
But then again BB gotta do as macronations daddy says because otherwise there is risk of losing the users that are actually funding BB right.
Last edited by sergio at 10/9/2021 8:19:35 PM