BuzzerBeater Forums

any advantage that I carved out was purely via day trading in the early seasons

Kinda. That got you ahead of the pack so it was easy to gobble up all the revenue streams. The added benefit of being able to train just about whoever and wherever helps too.

I'm not saying I didn't also win a lot trophies in my bigger pond, but i didnt win them all and I had a lot of luck on the way.

Whatever, its not like the economic imbalance between countries is as big an issue as between domestic divisions. The spread between division profits has much more impact then the difference between a few B3 opponents.

In the US, starting to see alot of the same teams bouncing up and down between I and II. Be interesting to see how many former NBBA teams promote up this season. Last season it was 3.

Nobody is punishing anybody. Bringing a normal BB economy to small countries will make them play the same game that made us mad. It will be much funnier for them.
On the other hand, most small countries are small because their population is simply not interested in basketball, not interesed in basket simulators, not interested even in Internet...
Just check who are the biggest countries... those who have strong basket leagues.
And also most managers in small countries are not native from these countries, they are american, spanish, greeks...

Try to make an online cricket simulator succesful in Spain...

so you like to push them out instead of giving them fair chanches, because they had the normal economy then you, the formulas are the same. Maybe they getting to a point - 2-3 season earlier but to be top, your income get reduced too like the one of the big countrys and it is the same game with few money and even disadvantage in international competition:

- small cup, less oppurtunity to tie

- fewer merchandise

- fewer tv income

This post is spot on. The issue is valid for both big and small countries. At the moment even a single 0-22 season in the top division can bring huge economic benefits. The way from being an average DII team to becoming an average DI team looks longer and longer with every season. Despite having higher salaries D1 teams still make bigger weekly profits then D2 teams. The way I see it, if a D1 team can save around 3mil per season and a D2 team can save around 2-2.5mil that D2 team is 1m further behind. In this sense it seems to be getting harder not only to get promoted more importantly to stay promoted(aka not get relegated back immediately).
The way the system works right now, with each season in a lower league you fall further behind instead of catching up.
With all this being said I must admit it works pretty much the same way in real life and there are still plenty of ways to improve your team by being smarter/better/more active/etc and if you are some of these things you should do just fine.

P.S. If somebody thinks I am wrong about this just consider the enormous advantage for teams who started earlier. I choose not write about that at all since there is not much we can do about it right now. And when you take into consideration both of these factors it becomes clear that "catching up" in this game is quite hard and it is probably going to get even harder in the future.

I would also add the gigantic pool of local players to choose from which equals even more merchandise money. Finding a good Bulgarian player on the market is nothing like finding a good Italian or American trust me.

thats was the reason for the merchandise +, which is in ym eyes calculate from league level and the own team and not affected by the opposition.

With even smaller nations then bulgaria, the people normally has a flag, so that they become even more expensiv to buy and if you don't train them and won't hurt your country you maybe get problem to buy 'em.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/28/2010 3:02:02 AM

Fair points.

The season someone started in trumps all at the end of the day because as the BB's monitored the economics of the game the so called 'loopholes' (either just there or created) when discovered gave simple cash. With 10,000 users you can spot annomalies in the transfer market that simply aren't there with 50,000+ eager eyes.

Beyond that I have questioned and have never really understood why we have new countries open up with under a dozen users - sure you got to start somewhere but I guess certain parts of the game which were set in stone at the outset are just too far down the line to make u-turns on. Falling short of capping off the larger countries and then re-directing new users to locations to even out the numbers.

What hasn't been mentioned in this thread is if you think club domination is boring and unfair what about countries? Sure you have managers willing and wanting to taste international experience if they can at any level but lets be frank the top X countries will change less frequently than the top club teams. For a game with 90+ countries this just seems a backward part of the game where only 1 of a handful of teams can ever win. (unless of course you are part of an inventive nation who will advocate farming and multi-accounts just to try and compete).

It strikes me that the need to preserve the country set up is preventing any radical change to even out the playing field with small/large countries.

this would be a good solution, and slow down low league starters a bit without hurting they chanches to be a big program

The only problem would be that the dominant teams werent slow down in their time, so this makes the disbalance even bigger inside the little countries, between one who recently starts and has to share the division with a dominating team.

hehe thats also a poitn.