BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Auto-Bid

Auto-Bid

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
198973.74 in reply to 198973.65
Date: 10/22/2011 11:39:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
You just keep repeating the same stuff, don't you? I'll play one more round, but that is it.

1) No it will not be more complicated.

Yes, it will. There will be more parameters to handle if you want to make the system useful. An important principle in BB is that the bid amount is frozen until the transfer completes or you are not the highest bidder anymore. This will either limit the usefulness of auto-bid (and there would at least seemingly be an advantage for those who have a lot of cash; I didn't really think this aspect through yet) or the system will require more complicated management. There are many potential issues: you may be in a situation where you preferred auto-bid will lag a less-desired one, or you are left wondering why your auto-bid never happened (e.g. if you ran out of money during the period and the bid therefore went inactive). You may claim that the system would not be more complex if you like, but you are just dead wrong.

Rookie-users could continue bidding online.
It will just start from the price set by the auto-bidding system.

Do you think this will put the new users in a disadvantage? Choose carefully. :-)

In addition. I didn't see any interaction besides the bidding itself in an auction at BB.

I did. For example, I have been several times in a bid war with the same team. I have been in bid wars with teams from the same league, with friends, etc. I have seen teams' bids because they may actually stay visible on the transfer list for a longer period in the current system.

So let's write exactly your claims here and we will quote them.
1)
"Giving advantage to those who are willing to spend some time is IMO actually a pretty good approach."

So you are claiming:
a) There is an advantage being oniline whenever you can.
b) There is a reason why it should give this advantage.

There is an advantage in the sense that you are there to make the call whether you want to go one higher as the auction is closing. This is a tradeoff in time. You spend the real-world time in the game to potentially land a player (a certain skill set) you want sooner than you would on average get a similar player (skill set) at potentially a lower price. I think this is appropriate, yes. I have seen no argument against this that actually holds water. Your argument (which I cut) is that this game is about BB management, which is not an argument that has much meaning. I am not even sure whether you mean 'basketball' or 'BuzzerBeater' by saying BB.

2)
due to supply of players, the advantage is generally rather insignificant for the majority of users.

And here is the opposite claim.
There is no in between.
Or that it gives an advantage or not. period.

There is no opposite claim. A small advantage is still an advantage, no? In majority of cases it is so insignificant that it does not matter much in the game. Try to see some shades of grey, please.

This Post:
00
198973.75 in reply to 198973.66
Date: 10/22/2011 11:41:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
3)
I do not believe the transfer market should be designed such that everyone is automatically going to get the best possible deal on any given player. Where's the fun in that? This is a game after all.

Basically you are consistently contradicts yourself - now you are arguing:
It gives great advantage for frequent online users and we deserve it.
No you don't. This is BB managing an not anything else.

Now you are simply insulting me and the readers of this thread. I admit that I have not read your latest answers to other users carefully, because you seem to just repeat the same stuff over and over again. I am however not happy with your style of twisting other people's arguments and putting words in their mouth, which has become very apparent in your replies to me and others.

Generaly speaking you are suggesting any claim (that contradicts each other) in favor of keeping your advantage.
By that keeping this game narrow to much smaller community.

Why not just giving money upon time a person is active on site?
It is purely the same.

I have explained to you already that there is no contradiction. And I am most definitely not trying to keep some super advantage to myself. How do you come up with this stuff? Look at my transfers, count them, see when I started in this game. I have lost many more bid wars (in the dozens) than won (perhaps half a dozen), and given the activity level of the average user I believe an auto-bid system would rather increase than reduce any advantage that I may or may not have.

I'm done with this, thanks.

This Post:
00
198973.76 in reply to 198973.73
Date: 10/22/2011 11:57:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I just think your merging ideas aren't practical.

Aren't practical?
First, you are changing again your argument,
Second, why isn't it practical? [Basically it is a claim w/o content].

And i didn't see your moinority on the old system.

Didn't understood your claim.

This Post:
00
198973.77 in reply to 198973.76
Date: 10/22/2011 12:21:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Aren't practical?
First, you are changing again your argument,
Second, why isn't it practical? [Basically it is a claim w/o content].


i never said anything else and explained it to you where detailed, don't know how you come up with changing mind.

This Post:
00
198973.78 in reply to 198973.70
Date: 10/22/2011 1:16:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Anyhow, I guess that one hour a day (and even less) is enough.
A team does go bot after 6 economic update. You are suggesting that this game should be equally playable for everyone. No just those who can log on whenever they want. Let's say a user can log on once a week. How can you make this game fair for him? Are you saying anyone that can not log in every day should not play this game? How can you expect a result in a discussion, when your starting theory is wrong and the outcome of your main claim is utopistic.
1) Question: Does it gives any advantage to narrow type of users?
Let's try to widen the search for your first question. Does knowing english in general give you any advantage in this game?, does more online time give you any advantage in this game?, does playing in small country give you any advantage in this game?, does better than dial-up connection give you any advantage in this game?
Should we forbid forum posts that are not understandable to everyone. If you want to post, you must have 98 translations (give or take) ready. Limit logins and time spent online. You can log in 5 times a week, not more than 5 hours total online time per weel (so you have to choose, either you want to do something else or watch games). Give everyone dial-up connection speed on the site (now this would be fun, most of us would soon quit).
If you read the forums carefully, I have been against many of the suggestions trying to give supporters any ingame or moneytary advantage. Notice the fact that I am a supporter myself. So your this assumption is also wrong ->
You are most definately defending a position with cause. Otherwise you wouldn't bring your false claims.

I don't like a game where you log in, push optimize button and log out. I like a game where I can influence things. Like: dealing with injuries (changing lineups), scouting opponents, choosing tactics, buying players. I don't need a comp to do those things for me.

This Post:
00
198973.79 in reply to 198973.74
Date: 10/22/2011 2:48:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I cannot do anything but repeating myself when all of you just repeating the same questions...

1) Your first part is the same thing written and answer more than I don't know how much...
It is not complicated as I've already described the all auction process.

2)
Do you think this will put the new users in a disadvantage? Choose carefully. :-)

And again, the same Q...
It is like if you would ask regarding any part of the game.
Of course veteran has advantage on the game.

On the other hand, it will improve the current unfairness with current auction system that gives advantage to thos who just can get online whenever they can.

Look, I decided at this point, as I feel that I just receive the same Q and answer the same A, to just stop.
Read my message with 5 Q and A and if something is missing right a new argument.

This Post:
00
198973.80 in reply to 198973.78
Date: 10/22/2011 3:38:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Anyhow, I guess that one hour a day (and even less) is enough.

A team does go bot after 6 economic update. You are suggesting that this game should be equally playable for everyone. No just those who can log on whenever they want. Let's say a user can log on once a week. How can you make this game fair for him? Are you saying anyone that can not log in every day should not play this game? How can you expect a result in a discussion, when your starting theory is wrong and the outcome of your main claim is utopistic.

Realy, you are now trying to turn what I'm saying to suite you by taking them completely out of context. This is absurd.
BB is not dedicated to those who cna play it 24/7 as much as it is not dedicated to those who cna play it once a decade.
As I said, 1Hr a day (in non comiting time manner) is a lot, and gives opportunity to a lot more and exluding those who aren't realy playing the game.
And no, onlie auction is not the target for BB managing.

Does knowing english in general give you any advantage in this game?

Come on it is totaly not related to the subject.
To be able to play there are needs. Also having access to a PC will be at that list.
After a user has this basic ability to "play the game" (any game), the only thing matters is the game itself.
To play this game enough time a week is a reasonable definition for the game.
To be online whenever there is a need in a day for having the same abilities like others, is just not.

I don't like a game where you log in, push optimize button and log out. I like a game where I can influence things. Like: dealing with injuries (changing lineups), scouting opponents, choosing tactics, buying players. I don't need a comp to do those things for me.

It is just not what it implies (and I've already said that...).
You can continue the bid-wars after the auto-bid part ends, and due to the fact that currently the users that wnat a player and just cannot be part of the auction just put the max value they thought this player should cost, it doesn't affect you at all.

Besides that, again, as the game is not about auction expert (or more presicely it is not about seeing how much one can be dedicated to the game), it doesn't realy change a lot for you.
Again, that is true besides the face that you and a very narrow group of optional users will stop having this advantage that is not part of BB managing.

This Post:
11
198973.81 in reply to 198973.80
Date: 10/22/2011 5:00:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I for example have bought 5 players in the last year (real time) and 4 players in the year before that. That has forced me to be online at a specific time once per 81 days (shocker!). I have also lost a few bidwars, so actually I "have" to be online about once a month (at a specific time). Like I said, I bought my last player setting the bid in advance, so I was really not online, when my team bought him. I really do not see a problem in that. How can you say that TL (or BB auction as you call it) is the main thing in this game? IT'S NOT, so it's not a problem.
Does knowing english in general give you any advantage in this game?
Come on it is totaly not related to the subject. To be able to play there are needs. Also having access to a PC will be at that list. After a user has this basic ability to "play the game" (any game), the only thing matters is the game itself. To play this game enough time a week is a reasonable definition for the game. To be online whenever there is a need in a day for having the same abilities like others, is just not.

That's where you are wrong. Everyone who can understand english has an advantage, over anyone, who does not. Most of the important (educational) discussions take place in the english speaking forums. I got very few responces and most of them were wrong, from Estonian forums, when I started playing. I then read all the english forums and got answers to most of my questions. Isn't that an advantage? NB! How come everything you say is a fact and everything everyone else says is a bad example or not relevant. I think I have shown you, that there are plenty of things in this game, that give you advantages compared to different kind of users.
Creating an auto-bid makes the game easier for daytraders with excess funds. Eventually it will drive the prices higher. There prolly will be more bugs (examples: when auto-bid fails to register, or auto-bid fails to stop and spends more than it supposed to spend), we don't even know how badly the new algorithm might stress the already slow servers.
Like many here have stated. I like playing against humans, not computers. TL gives us that option. I love it that there can be human errors. Examples: forget myself reading the forums and miss out on a player I wanted to bid on, paying more than I should of paid and regretting it afterwords, etc.
What are we missing atm in TL? Nothing. We have a system where anyone can bid (if they have funds). You can always bid a sum, that you are willing to pay or think is enough and might get the player without additional bid. There are different strategys in TL, bid high early and scare off competition or wait till the last minute and try to get that player cheap, risking to be in a bidwar with a number of managers. I think a small reward in lower price (which is not always guaranteed) is ok for being able to be online when the auction ends. It's not a gamechanger by any means.
Auto-bid will create more hassle, raises prices, makes the game more automatic and brings no new gains to the TL. Looking at the average team transfer per year and looking at the players available on TL, for the average team, there is nothing that would imply, that you can not get a decent player at a time suitable for you. It might be harder for the top teams, but logging in once a month, to bid on that special player, is really not that stressful.
I think many of us have made the ultimate mistake of dragging this thread too long (obviously you disregard any facts but your own). We should have let this thread die out, like all of the other auto-bid threads. I am 99% sure BB's will not implement auto-bid system, atleast not based on this suggestion, because you have not made any (zero, zip, nada) new points in this thread. I will let my wife tie my hands now, so I could not respond to your messages any more:D I urge everyone else to do the same.

This Post:
00
198973.82 in reply to 198973.81
Date: 10/23/2011 4:14:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
How can you say that TL (or BB auction as you call it) is the main thing in this game? IT'S NOT, so it's not a problem.

1) In case TL = Transfer List so what is it relevant to the auction process?
2) You are right - this game is not about BB auction!!! This is why there is no reason to give advantage at this field. Advantage that is not related to BB managing.

Like I said, I bought my last player setting the bid in advance, so I was really not online, when my team bought him.

So, you paid the max amount for that player, amount no body find worth it.
In other word - you out bid for that player.
As money is what allows oneimprove its team, this is just one example why it is needed!

Everyone who can understand english has an advantage, over anyone, who does not. Most of the important (educational) discussions take place in the english speaking forums.

What can I say... NOT RELVANT.
Giving examples of things that gives advantage to some users and claiming that this shows that "being unfair is fair" is just not making any sense.
1) Most of the users knows english good enough.
2) They should try to have translation for each forum and word written here, but this is not simple and it is very costly.

Creating an auto-bid makes the game easier for daytraders with excess funds

No it does not - the price reflects player's value.
How does it gives more advantage for "daytraders with excess funds" is just a mystery...

Eventually it will drive the prices higher

The other way around.
Plays like you wrote about - putting a value (not being online) that no one thought offering will not happen!

There prolly will be more bugs

Again, you are just digging for more excuses...
Coding is not relevant here - this is for the developers to prioritize and test before delivering.

I like playing against humans, not computers

Again... After the auto-bidding only online users will be allowed to bid, and as the value will not be higher from when someone decides (like you did) to put bid from start, it will most definately allow not less human bid-wars.

As the votes shows - it is NOT all but one caliming in favor or Auto-Bidding.
Moreover - whose who has less time for playing BB (and hence will support Auto-Bid system), will less likely lose their expansive BB time for suggestion forum.

This Post:
00
198973.84 in reply to 198973.7
Date: 10/23/2011 4:53:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
You shouldn't be able to bid more than you have, so if the Auto Bid would take you over the available money you have you would be out of the bidding.

Seems pretty obvious for me.

Advertisement