BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeater Arenas

BuzzerBeater Arenas

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
56772.74 in reply to 56772.68
Date: 2/22/2009 1:16:42 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
The aim of BBs is to make BB a complete management game


...so you want to punish teams who make good choices
oh yes, great idea

This Post:
00
56772.75 in reply to 56772.74
Date: 2/22/2009 1:32:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
...so you want to punish teams who make good choices
oh yes, great idea


you mean, punish teams that took advantage of making more money in the early seasons to build a nearly insurmountable advantage over any lower division teams.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
56772.76 in reply to 56772.74
Date: 2/22/2009 1:43:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
you are too smart to understand that the choice of builidng arenas very big(40k,not 10-15 k as the yours),gave too structural advantages as the system is now.This is becoming the "Right Choice",not one of the choises to develop the game of a single user.

@CrazyEye:The market is global,the discussion of incomes have to consider the differences between the various countries

This Post:
00
56772.77 in reply to 56772.75
Date: 2/22/2009 1:49:07 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
...so you want to punish teams who make good choices
oh yes, great idea


you mean, punish teams that took advantage of making more money in the early seasons to build a nearly insurmountable advantage over any lower division teams.


and how do you recognize such a team? by arena size?

This Post:
00
56772.78 in reply to 56772.75
Date: 2/22/2009 2:48:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
You know, it's rather refreshing—and reassuring— when a manager who has been/is there already can see the point-of-view of the teams that are not there. It is indeed a struggle for the teams now starting—we should do all we can not to penalize them or keep them from advancing. GM—brianjames always shows leadership in this regard even though he is at the top...Pappy

Pappy
This Post:
00
56772.79 in reply to 56772.78
Date: 2/22/2009 5:49:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Excellent point, thanks GM-BrianJames for considering the little guy objectively.

It should not be easy at all to catch up to established teams, but it should not be impossible either. I have not seen a solution presented yet that wont help some teams and hurt others. No matter what happens some form of this discussion will probably always be present and debated. I just wonder what is best for the game as a whole? A Padron Aniversario mailed in a humi-mailer to the person who can answer that one.

From: /joao

This Post:
00
56772.80 in reply to 56772.79
Date: 2/22/2009 6:16:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Someone nailed it when said that expanding arenas to monster ones are becoming the only way to mantain at top.

Surely it is not something wanted by BB staff. At the end, there should still be alternatives to succeed.

Something similar with training - i believe its about time to enhance team training in order to amplify manager options and escape from 2 position training-selling-one-to-compensate-other-positions.






This Post:
00
56772.81 in reply to 56772.80
Date: 2/22/2009 7:30:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
or the BBs can introduce maintenance fees for arenas.

This Post:
00
56772.82 in reply to 56772.78
Date: 2/22/2009 11:02:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Shall i tell you why I stopped building...

I just have this horrible hunch that as soon as I construct again the next day there will be an announcement about arena taxes....

I do admire the German building phenomenon but the ROI for each seat above 30,000 is unbeleivable and perhaps it is looking better than it is due to defation on the transfer market.

BUT i guess with 10% arena tax again this year and no real sign of inflation around the corner, 1 more season of expansion will effectively set most established teams up for their entire BB life....

So who wants me to press the button!!!

This Post:
00
56772.83 in reply to 56772.82
Date: 2/23/2009 5:52:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
There was a time 2/3 season ago where first division teams around the BB world earned too much money.Some teams going crazy on the market and bought player for 6/7/8 Mio.Other teams like many german users spend the most in their arenas.And now should these teams get punished?!Thats a shame!!


my 2 cents

Cheers

This Post:
00
56772.84 in reply to 56772.76
Date: 2/23/2009 6:17:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
you are too smart to understand that the choice of builidng arenas very big(40k,not 10-15 k as the yours),gave too structural advantages as the system is now.This is becoming the "Right Choice",not one of the choises to develop the game of a single user.

@CrazyEye:The market is global,the discussion of incomes have to consider the differences between the various countries



The other way , you want to punish people who planned for a long time, when they start to get their advantage?

You don't punish the short time thinkers, who got their succes, and even could build their arenas and you forget also, that building arena could help you catch up to etablish teams, i just say flying munchkins. With a big arena is it much easier to get the necessary money you need for a top S5. So make your choiches, but you could compete even with a long term plan.

Advertisement