BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: darykjozef

To: Aric
This Post:
00
381.741 in reply to 381.710
Date: 9/18/2008 6:43:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Sorry if I am a few days late to read this, but all subsequent posts seem to have overlooked what I believe to be the most important part of your data:

Training JR for PG/SG, only player 3 gets up to 48 min. on every weeks, others plays 40 to 50 min


So the main flaw in your training may be that you only have ONE player getting the required 48 minutes for training every week (and he's 6'5"). This data would be far more informative if you had 4 players getting 48min/wk.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: Aric

This Post:
00
381.742 in reply to 381.741
Date: 9/18/2008 7:01:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
this player have a chance to play in National Team, he must play minimum 48 min at week. training is set up for him.

orher players plays regulary about 48 min, for me play time it dasn't matter, becouse two players are pops faster then him, so tell me, what do you think about it??

Last edited by Aric at 9/18/2008 7:01:23 AM

From: darykjozef

To: Aric
This Post:
00
381.743 in reply to 381.742
Date: 9/18/2008 7:16:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
I think if you trimmed your number of trainees from six down to four, you would have 4 guys getting 48 minutes a week without much difficulty.

The players that are popping faster than him are shorter, some by as much as 5 inches.

I'll preface the following by admitting that I know next to nothing about training guard skills; but I'm suddenly intrigued enough to wonder if the taller players would have any better luck training JR (outside shooting) for Wingmen...?

We've learned that training one-on-one for forwards trains IS, where one-on-one for guards does NOT train IS. I'd be interested to hear anyone with extensive experience training Wingmen chime in at this point.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: Aric

This Post:
00
381.744 in reply to 381.743
Date: 9/18/2008 7:54:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
I think if you trimmed your number of trainees from six down to four, you would have 4 guys getting 48 minutes a week without much difficulty.

but, this would be a waste of 2 training slots. waste a lot of money.:)

IMHO there's no much difference in speed training when player plays 45 and 48 minutes. I think differences shows up when your player have much better other skill, and 5 inches is to little to affect for training speed so much.

This Post:
00
381.745 in reply to 381.744
Date: 9/18/2008 10:33:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
IMHO there's no much difference in speed training when player plays 45 and 48 minutes.


There is indeed a pretty significant difference.

45 minutes doesn't come anywhere near close to 93.75% training.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.746 in reply to 381.744
Date: 9/18/2008 11:38:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506

IMHO there's no much difference in speed training when player plays 45 and 48 minutes.


my observation about 8 weeks training:

Outside Shooting
PG/SG:
Trains JR @ 2-8 weeks


That's a difference of 6(!) weeks.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 9/18/2008 11:38:40 AM

This Post:
00
381.747 in reply to 381.745
Date: 9/18/2008 1:52:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
IMHO there's no much difference in speed training when player plays 45 and 48 minutes.


There is indeed a pretty significant difference.

45 minutes doesn't come anywhere near close to 93.75% training.

The difference is more than 6.25%. I don't think, however, that it is _that_ much more.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
381.748 in reply to 381.747
Date: 9/18/2008 2:59:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I bet it's at least 25% reduction.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.749 in reply to 381.748
Date: 9/18/2008 3:03:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
Are you serious? That much for only 3 minutes short?

This Post:
00
381.750 in reply to 381.749
Date: 9/18/2008 3:42:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Yes, there's a big emphasis placed on getting to 48.

I can't say that it's specifically that much, but it's a lot more than most people think.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.751 in reply to 381.750
Date: 9/18/2008 4:54:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
Thank you for making such a clear statement about it!

Advertisement