BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy

Economy

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
161502.75 in reply to 161502.73
Date: 10/20/2010 11:28:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but you don't change it, in fighting for top talents to make this prices even higher ;)(and yes you are not the only one who does it)

I believe for training it makes more sense to bring up some 100k trainees, to a 1million deal then paying for potential stars the sum you pay for already stars. Or get a already star, and train him out of position to make him to a kind of star player who had a higher value(and be happy that you don't have to train that much, as you had to do with a youngster).


This Post:
00
161502.76 in reply to 161502.75
Date: 10/20/2010 11:41:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Find me a 100k salary guard that you can buy for 1 milion,and I surely would buy him next time

This Post:
00
161502.78 in reply to 161502.77
Date: 10/20/2010 12:03:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Find me a 100k salary guard that you can buy for 1 milion,and I surely would buy him next time



I believe he means a transfer price of 100k, train them until you can sell them for a transfer price of 1million. Then use the funds from there.

In the medium time also this strategy is unefficient in my eyes,since to reach a good sum of money like 3 milions to buy a single top class level you should use 3 entire seasons for 3 trainees,sell them and buy 1 player,leaving the team with holes in rotation where the 3 trainees previously played.You have a virtual profit in your transfer history page,but probably not in your roster team page

This Post:
00
161502.80 in reply to 161502.78
Date: 10/20/2010 12:27:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Find me a 100k salary guard that you can buy for 1 milion,and I surely would buy him next time



I believe he means a transfer price of 100k, train them until you can sell them for a transfer price of 1million. Then use the funds from there.

In the medium time also this strategy is unefficient in my eyes,since to reach a good sum of money like 3 milions to buy a single top class level you should use 3 entire seasons for 3 trainees,sell them and buy 1 player,leaving the team with holes in rotation where the 3 trainees previously played.You have a virtual profit in your transfer history page,but probably not in your roster team page


I gotta say Steve that your arguments are really weak and its ok to man up and confess to being wrong once in a while (hell even I do it occasionally!)

There is no way even with deflation you cant find 3-4 trainees at 500k-1mil and turn them around for 2mil, 1.5 seasons later.

If a manager has 3mil and cant turn that into 5mil over a season whether that be on 1 trainee or 3 then you are not going to climb the ladder - you will simply be passed by those that can and will do this.

Last edited by Superfly Guy at 10/20/2010 12:28:27 PM

This Post:
00
161502.81 in reply to 161502.80
Date: 10/20/2010 12:47:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404


There is no way even with deflation you cant find 3-4 trainees at 500k-1mil and turn them around for 2mil, 1.5 seasons later.

so,in 4,5 season,working in this way,you would have 6 milions,that you can use to buy 3 very good players,right
During these seasons,spending for trainees with good potential(perennial allstar/superstar) 1-1,5M for every trainee(let's say 5 M in tola)you can train 3 good players good as the previous three,and you can also choose how to develop them

Do I miss some count?

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 10/20/2010 12:47:50 PM

This Post:
00
161502.83 in reply to 161502.82
Date: 10/21/2010 8:18:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Can anyone explain when the $500 k threshold for bankrupcy kicks in?

Hypothetical with a few away games in a row starting next week my bank balance will soon drop from -130K to -550k before my merchandise and tv money boosts my balance back upto approximately -400K on the same day.

Will this trigger the 500K threshold for bankrupcy or is the 500k figure only breached after merchandise and tv money is considered?

The answer to this will affect my plans as I can trade my way back out of debt without selling players but would sell one now if I knew that I was going to start the ticking bankrupcy clock

As always sell a few fringe players off prior to the finals

Sid

Last edited by Sid Vicious at 10/21/2010 8:21:06 AM

This Post:
00
161502.84 in reply to 161502.83
Date: 10/21/2010 12:08:30 PM
Totwart
ACBB
Overall Posts Rated:
31483148
Second Team:
Furabolos
What is taking into account is your balance before the economic update.
Try to use help forums for these questions, please

This Post:
00
161502.85 in reply to 161502.47
Date: 10/22/2010 12:21:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155

Players worry about spending because they have only a few trophies available to them. League + Cup.
If there was a BB3 equivalent for all Division 2 winners or Division 3 winners (Division 4/5 would be too many teams) - this would encourage promotion and also you would imagine encourage more teams to fiercely compete at all costs.


I really, really like the idea of more competitions. Back in the small fish/big fish debate I originally brought up that I would like to see other shadow tournaments to the B3. To take it even further, there is still room for more competitors in the B3 (hence the fact that some teams get a 1st round bye).

So how to fill the spots for the B3? First, I would not re-invite past winners of the B3. Just because they win it one year does not mean anything about future years.

Then, continue with the cup and league winners making it. Fill the remaining spots through world ranking. And if at some point the # of winners gets too large, drop teams with the lowest world ranking.

As for the shadow tournament(s), those spots could be filled once again using world ranking.

I know that the world ranking has some issues. But that could also be worked on. ;-)

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
Advertisement