BuzzerBeater Forums

What about an idea where you actually start the season with all drafts displaying ALL their skills / potential / height

Then you select how much you want to pay. ie. Your original data is 20% accurate and the equivalent of spending $10k a week can bring that up to 40%, $20k a week = 60% and $40k a week = 80%

So the beginning step will be something like your scouts were told this kid will be playing tonight come down and watch him..(step 0-1 / first investment)...then it goes on from there.

Then depending on how much you pay you can send a scout to watch him and after each visit 1 or 2 more of his stats are confirmed or altered before you end up the season with many jumbled reads from which you select.

So if you spend nothing each season you have a lot of information that is simply not accurate OR as you spend more money each week you have a greater chance of that information being true as a couple of the stats change or bolden to confirm they are true.

This wouldnt effect people scouting the same guy as many scouts could watch the same player and some would come away with confirmed knowledge of his age/JS some would confirm his RB/Potential etc.

In order to solve should i scout a 1* or 5* maybe you should need to scout a player 3X to be guaranteed to get 2 bits of information of your choice? If the stats of the players at the beginning were pretty similar then maybe if the first read came back with worse confirmations this would indicate (although not 100%) that the player scouting was likely of low value/little use.

This style of draft would also allow managers to lean towards the skillsets they value most or might need due to the other players currently on their roster.

What about the Scout? The fourth member of the staff...

I was actually just coming here to post this, but looks like I was beaten to it.

Implementing a scout as a 4th staff member could make a lot of sense... the levels could be roughly matched to the 5/10/20/40k scouting prices we have now, and would allow specialties to address some of the issues that have been raised in this thread.

For example, maybe you get a Frequent Flyer specialty, where your scout travels as much as possible, getting a lot of 1 visit scoutings, but very few repeat visits. Conversely, you could have an in depth scout that would tend to spend more time at each scouting visit, increasing the likelihood you'll get 2nd impressions of players (whether good or bad players), but decreasing the total # you can scout.

Plus the idea of having a scout as part of the staff makes much more sense than having it included in the Training menu.

The idea is nice but I have some doubts. A lots of the expenses on scouting are not based on a single person. And a network should have money availible like a budget and not so much as a salary.
This suggestion makes it almost impossible to cut short-term expenditures. I am only in 4th league and like it very much that I have a grip on these costs all the time.

Just my 2 cents ;)

The reason that so many people are complaining is because most find it not worthwhile to invest money at all to the scouts - much better off buying directly from the market. Even for the bottom teams who get the first few picks, they are still not guaranteed to benefit from the draft system (money invested in scouts>value of draftees). So I would like to offer a quick fix here: why not lower the scout cost, for example, by 50%? Because currently I think the scout is an investment too risky for most team - fair return, but very high risk. It is punishing the top teams for investing any money at all, which I don't think that is the purpose?

maybe with the S,M, L and XL modell.

Hey, nice one!

Um, you necromanced (making up words, yay) a year-old thread...? Well, just in case you didn't know, this thread no longer applies because the draft system is, in fact, new-ish.

Um, you necromanced (making up words, yay) a year-old thread...? Well, just in case you didn't know, this thread no longer applies because the draft system is, in fact, new-ish.

Its still crap and makes no sense in the current system.

The new draft is great. Want to know any info, invest something.

Seriously, this is my solution. You can't make money off the draft unless you are incredibly lucky. So spend your $640,000 elsewhere.

I bet if everyone did that the BBs would work on a new draft system.

I spend 0 in the draft and I think that's the best investment choice. I can buy a decent rainee for 50k, so why invest 10k a week for the lottery ticket that will probably give me nothing but crap.