BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > The inquisitive diary of a buzzernoob

The inquisitive diary of a buzzernoob

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
302634.77 in reply to 302634.76
Date: 3/20/2020 7:36:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
oh, I think I might have gotten the hang of how you use the estimation to sort out the max tsp
all skills seem to be linear though ...and suddenly I see how important potential is (also feel like kicking myself in the balls for training PGs in inside defense and leaving my superstar untrained, who apparently at 51 TSP is almost at 70% potential reached...makes me scratch my head - might need to lower my hype levels again)

This Post:
00
302634.80 in reply to 302634.71
Date: 3/21/2020 6:32:07 AM
Dynamo J. Hradec
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
499499
And what about the salaries of the staff? I saw trainer level 6 going for 8 millions because of his salary 5000.

This Post:
11
302634.82 in reply to 302634.81
Date: 3/21/2020 10:06:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
so any trainer higher than 5 is a waste of money if you're not interested in farming?

yeah, I could imagine I will be doing the same. Don't know why, but for now (48105417) seems to be that guy for me (he does look complete trash, but he's the one I kept the spotlight on until now)

This Post:
00
302634.84 in reply to 302634.83
Date: 3/21/2020 12:59:55 PM
Dynamo J. Hradec
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
499499
You'll never buy a trainer level 6 with 5000 salary for 2 millions. Buying him for 8 millions is totally reasonable - you can keep him for a very long time.

You can buy one with salary around 30000 for 1 million or less (I did twice). And you need one when you train NT prospects.

This Post:
00
302634.86 in reply to 302634.85
Date: 3/21/2020 3:51:18 PM
Dynamo J. Hradec
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
499499
You didn't, I mixed up two your answers, my fault.

Nonetheless I disagree buying that trainer for 8 M is idiotic. It makes sense for someone who needs him and it's financially OK. Or at least it was at the moment.

This Post:
22
302634.87 in reply to 302634.76
Date: 3/25/2020 8:51:40 AM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14331433
Potential is for the player, not for individual skills. Each skill has a different effect on the potential it uses, depending on the overall skillset. If your player is a Center, raising Inside Shot 1 level eats a good amount of potential. If your player is a PG however, raising Inside shot 1 level barely uses any potential at all.

Also, the potential in Buzzer Manager is not up to date. There have been changes to Shotblocking and Jump Range which are not reflected in the tool; they use less potential in reality than in the tool.

The value of potential on a player depends on wether it will be a limiting factor, and that depends on your skill in training, your trainer/facilities and his starting skills. Usually, a new player doesn't have a lot of skills/assets for training, so a player with high potential doesn't mean much since a new player probably won't be able to train that player to it's cap. The better your skills/training assets, the more important the potential becomes. Also, your goal with the players matter a lot; if you want to train a balanced SF you need less potential than a traditional Center.

Seeing that you're into training, inquisitive enough to increase your training skills and willingness to invest in training assets, I'd say you can use higher potential players. I'd go for 7 minimum, 8 is fine and 9 is nice to have.

Also, to compare 18 and 19 year old draftees, consider that the 1st year of training can yield 10-18 skill points (depending on your training assets and which skills you train). So relatively speaking, your 18-yo player with 47 has more TSP than your 19-yo player with 58 TSP. He also has higher potential. However, you can get an 18-yo 8 potential player with 50+ TSP for cheap on the market, which makes for an even better trainee. They won't be home grown (and possibly not even from your country), so that means less merchandising income.

Enough food for thoughts I assume :)

Advertisement