BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Why 3-2?

Why 3-2?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
290960.78 in reply to 290960.77
Date: 7/7/2018 8:02:20 AM
Szepiz Playground
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
I would say for these kind of games, my line up is with 7 players. Those 5 that I gave you earlier are the starting 5. (Pg1 and Pg2 in question, because which I should I prefer, the 1+ od or the 2+ SB). however Subs players are much lower in OD, and one of them is obviously for C or PF.
Ok so far 1 vote for 3-2 and one to stick with m2m.
Sz.

This Post:
00
290960.81 in reply to 290960.79
Date: 7/7/2018 9:33:54 AM
Szepiz Playground
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
He is not in the top 10 at rebounding.
His PF and C averages 11 / game.
My Pf and C both 13/game.

With the other set up that you mentioned my problem is I will be loosing my best C and my offense would be LI. And my C has 18 IS. Also If I`m going to put my SG to SF, he has very low IS 6 compering with my SF who has 18 Is.

This Post:
00
290960.82 in reply to 290960.81
Date: 7/7/2018 2:34:46 PM
Aittakorven Torjunta & Heitto
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
22162216
Second Team:
Moltas Matsson Academy
Oh, you took it easily! Nice job!

This Post:
00
290960.83 in reply to 290960.82
Date: 7/7/2018 2:51:47 PM
Szepiz Playground
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
Yes. Was very easy.. I thought that it was harder.
Thanks all the help.
Sz.

From: hene10

This Post:
00
290960.85 in reply to 290960.84
Date: 7/7/2018 10:57:28 PM
Aittakorven Torjunta & Heitto
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
22162216
Second Team:
Moltas Matsson Academy
Yes, you're right. And my opponent wasn't the easiest one either