BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Rashmon
This Post:
00
381.789 in reply to 381.788
Date: 11/2/2008 9:15:19 PM
Rashmonsters
III.7
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Question: Is the training cumulative? I believe the answer is yes, but to what degree?

For example, if a bench player rarely gets the weekly 48 minutes, will his repeated sub-48 training eventually accumulate to a pop?

Thanks in advance

This Post:
00
381.790 in reply to 381.789
Date: 11/2/2008 9:25:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Question: Is the training cumulative? I believe the answer is yes, but to what degree?

For example, if a bench player rarely gets the weekly 48 minutes, will his repeated sub-48 training eventually accumulate to a pop?

Thanks in advance

It will, obviously. The common belief is, however, that two 24-minute games give you less training than one 48-minute game. The degree of loss of training is not very well known.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
381.791 in reply to 381.790
Date: 11/2/2008 11:25:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
The common belief is, however, that two 24-minute games give you less training than one 48-minute game.


I'll go a step further and say that is definitive fact.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.792 in reply to 381.791
Date: 11/2/2008 11:30:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
The common belief is, however, that two 24-minute games give you less training than one 48-minute game.


I'll go a step further and say that is definitive fact.


I think you need to make very clear that this is two 24-minute games that are in DIFFERENT game weeks....

This Post:
00
381.793 in reply to 381.792
Date: 11/2/2008 11:51:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
The common belief is, however, that two 24-minute games give you less training than one 48-minute game.


I'll go a step further and say that is definitive fact.


I think you need to make very clear that this is two 24-minute games that are in DIFFERENT game weeks....


Correct.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.794 in reply to 381.793
Date: 11/2/2008 11:58:15 PM
Rashmonsters
III.7
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Thanks to all who replied. Very enlightening.

This Post:
00
381.795 in reply to 381.793
Date: 11/3/2008 6:02:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
you must explain this to me

for you if in a week a player make 48 minutes in one match and another make 24+24=48 (with 48 minute sign into weekly stat) the first take more train then yeh second???

if you say this i think that isn't correct but maybe i ahve undestand wrong

This Post:
00
381.796 in reply to 381.795
Date: 11/3/2008 6:59:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
you must explain this to me

for you if in a week a player make 48 minutes in one match and another make 24+24=48 (with 48 minute sign into weekly stat) the first take more train then yeh second???

if you say this i think that isn't correct but maybe i ahve undestand wrong


Couldnt see that coming! Maybe someone other than Kozlodoev can answer!

From my knowledge of the game - 2x24 in the same gameweek is the same as 1x48 BUT this is assuming that the seconds are the same as minutes are rounded as well... so a player who plays every second of a scrimmage may receive more training than a player who plays 23mins and 46secs in 1 game added with 23mins and 45secs in another game even though both examples will show 48mins in the weekly stats page.

Hows that for an answer!??!!

Last edited by Superfly Guy at 11/3/2008 7:00:38 AM

This Post:
00
381.797 in reply to 381.795
Date: 11/3/2008 7:10:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
you must explain this to me

for you if in a week a player make 48 minutes in one match and another make 24+24=48 (with 48 minute sign into weekly stat) the first take more train then yeh second???

if you say this i think that isn't correct but maybe i ahve undestand wrong

The idea was that if you train 24 minutes in two different weeks, the player will get less training than if he trains 48 minutes in a signle week.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
381.798 in reply to 381.797
Date: 11/3/2008 10:58:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
oh it's ok

in italy we are shure that there isn't a linear corrispondence from minutes and training

i.e. 48 m = 100% and 24m =50% and only in this case 24 + 24 in two different week are ugual to 48 in a week

i personally think taht there is a parabolic corrispondence

From: furkan
This Post:
00
381.799 in reply to 381.798
Date: 11/3/2008 11:16:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
In two 24 player plays in same position or different position? If each of them is different pos. then this can be the answer.

Advertisement