BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
381.797 in reply to 381.795
Date: 11/3/2008 7:10:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
you must explain this to me

for you if in a week a player make 48 minutes in one match and another make 24+24=48 (with 48 minute sign into weekly stat) the first take more train then yeh second???

if you say this i think that isn't correct but maybe i ahve undestand wrong

The idea was that if you train 24 minutes in two different weeks, the player will get less training than if he trains 48 minutes in a signle week.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
381.798 in reply to 381.797
Date: 11/3/2008 10:58:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
oh it's ok

in italy we are shure that there isn't a linear corrispondence from minutes and training

i.e. 48 m = 100% and 24m =50% and only in this case 24 + 24 in two different week are ugual to 48 in a week

i personally think taht there is a parabolic corrispondence

From: furkan
This Post:
00
381.799 in reply to 381.798
Date: 11/3/2008 11:16:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
In two 24 player plays in same position or different position? If each of them is different pos. then this can be the answer.

From: Thijs

This Post:
00
381.800 in reply to 381.798
Date: 11/3/2008 1:34:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
Well, JuicePats doesn't think so: (381.745)

From: micio82

This Post:
00
381.801 in reply to 381.800
Date: 11/3/2008 1:59:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
i don't understand you?? what meaning this??

also for me there is a big differenza from 45 and 48 but more then juice. for me is about a little less then 90%

This Post:
00
381.802 in reply to 381.801
Date: 11/3/2008 2:01:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
i don't understand you?? what meaning this??

also for me there is a big differenza from 45 and 48 but more then juice. for me is about a little less then 90%


I think the difference is even more than that.

I can confirm as indisputable fact that training percentages for players who get less than 48 minutes in a week are not linear.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: Thijs

This Post:
00
381.803 in reply to 381.801
Date: 11/3/2008 2:04:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
Ok, so you would agree that a player who has 48 minutes in week 1, and 0 in week 2 will get more training overall then a player who plays 24 minutes in both week1 and week 2? If so, I misread your post.

This Post:
00
381.804 in reply to 381.802
Date: 11/3/2008 4:03:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
thank you

Last edited by micio82 at 11/3/2008 4:04:06 PM

From: micio82

This Post:
00
381.805 in reply to 381.803
Date: 11/3/2008 4:09:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
in my first post i hasked if they spoken about one player that played 24+24 in the same week trained less then 48 in one match or if they spoken about 24+24 in different weeks

in first case i'm disagree in second case i agree but now i understood that they spoken about the first case

This Post:
00
381.806 in reply to 381.805
Date: 11/3/2008 11:48:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
It makes no difference how a player gets to 48 minutes in a week.

If a player plays 24 minutes in week 1, he receives some proportion of the training, but almost certainly less than 50%.

The following week, he also plays 24 minutes (who is the gm that can only get a guy 24 minutes in three games?). Again he receives less than 50% training.

And so on.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
381.807 in reply to 381.806
Date: 11/4/2008 3:44:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
yes yes we say the same thing but maybe my english is to bad to explain thisDD

i'm agree with juice: training its not linear

Advertisement