BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Which is the better option?

Which is the better option?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
131439.8 in reply to 131439.6
Date: 2/13/2010 6:20:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I think the benefit of a 6 coach is being greatly exagerated, and if put correctly ( Its probably 1 or 2 in rare cases on pops) then the decision becomes a lot clearer.

Running the examples above, a 1 Million saving on coaches against Respectable to Profcient

1 Million will buy you a player with Prolific at the main areas.

I would suggest that a financial threshold is crossed for a clubs weekly profit which would then make it the right decison to get a 6 coach, but moving to early for a 6 may take you backwards in your overall progress as a franchise

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
131439.9 in reply to 131439.5
Date: 2/13/2010 8:42:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i would even go below that, and maybe make one week out of it, and for me they seem to be unecononic , at least i don#t need him even when i got/have high quality trainees ;)

Maybe you could do it about patriotic isssues.

This Post:
00
131439.10 in reply to 131439.8
Date: 2/13/2010 10:23:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
i get the feeling the competition levels at the very highest levels are so intense that one or two extra pops (per season!) could be worth under the right circumstances perhaps one-half point a game -- get a couple more of these advantages (say, game shape, free throws, stamina, the HCA) and you have the margin of victory. Us mortals are not operating on such an intense level -- the level where improvements are so tiny, so incremental. At least some of those who are bidding up the coaches are looking for an edge, a tiny edge, and money does not matter.

at least, that would be my guess.

This Post:
00
131439.11 in reply to 131439.8
Date: 2/14/2010 5:08:58 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
Just buy a level 5 making about $20,000 a week..I got a level 5 making 16,600 a week and the signing bonus cost me 425,000....very doable

From: Azrail

This Post:
00
131439.12 in reply to 131439.9
Date: 2/14/2010 7:14:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
259259
i would even go below that, and maybe make one week out of it, and for me they seem to be unecononic , at least i don#t need him even when i got/have high quality trainees ;)

Maybe you could do it about patriotic isssues.


yes, this is also a reason:).But, as i said before, it's up to you what to choose .

This Post:
00
131439.13 in reply to 131439.11
Date: 2/14/2010 12:25:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
OK, Thanks for the input. I think I'll go for a 5 just to be on the safe side & let that play out for a season or so.

Right is not a popularity contest!
This Post:
00
131439.14 in reply to 131439.13
Date: 2/14/2010 2:19:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I have looked at your team and it seems you have purchased a lot of young players who arent that good.

I would suggest a 6 Coach to try and catch up in your league and maybe develop those players into something worthwhile!!!

Good Luck

This Post:
00
131439.15 in reply to 131439.14
Date: 2/15/2010 1:58:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I would respectfully disagree vehemently with Carl Future. Level 6 is unnecessary for 54000 teams in this game. Maybe more.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
131439.16 in reply to 131439.15
Date: 2/15/2010 3:39:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I dont believe you can pass such a generic view, it really depends on a case by case basis.

Pistons 3 are in the top division of Wales, with a Team that belongs in the 4th or 3rd Div in England. He has many youngstrs in his team and will be turning over a larger profit than in normal circumstances.

In this scenario he will need to try and catch up with the top teams in Div 1, and although he will lose around $60,000 per week by getting a 6 coach, I believe his finances would still allow him to make Good Money and have the benefit of a 6 Coach.

I do agree , a 6 Coach is not for everyone, infact not for the larger % of teams , however, there is a requirement and indeed it does make sence in some cases.


This Post:
00
131439.17 in reply to 131439.16
Date: 2/15/2010 12:24:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Like I said, I respectfully vehemently disagree with you that Pistons#3 is a team that would benefit from having a level 6 trainer. First of all, there is absolutely no reason why a d. 1 team should have an arena of 5250 seats. He should take the money he is considering spending on a ridiculously overpriced level 6 trainer and get 50 luxury boxes, 500 courtside, 3000 lower tier, and 10000+ bleachers. Then he should decide if he wants to train guards or big men, sell the 18 year olds of the positions he doesn't want to train and buy some older more experienced players. Then, because most of his youngsters are of average potential- Marzano and Greid being the two players he should be focusing his trainingon IMO- he should not worry about a level 6 coach, but go with a level 4 at a much lower price and a very similar result rate.
That is my opinion of this case.
And, that is what makes this game so much fun. There are a lot of different opinions on how to play it.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
131439.18 in reply to 131439.16
Date: 2/15/2010 12:55:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959

In this scenario he will need to try and catch up with the top teams in Div 1, and although he will lose around $60,000 per week by getting a 6 coach, I believe his finances would still allow him to make Good Money and have the benefit of a 6 Coach.


if the level 6 coach is a good decision for him, it will be for all other managers too ;) because in this case you will get your investment(salary and buying) back through training, but i doubt it.

Advertisement