BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New Tactics

New Tactics

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
159620.8 in reply to 159620.7
Date: 10/7/2010 9:57:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Better might be "starter", "backup", "reserve", because one guy will not be in the field all the time. The advantage is that you could pick 3 from different positions.

So once would defend (attack) like that your PG starter, once your SG backup, once your SF starter.

This Post:
11
159620.9 in reply to 159620.8
Date: 10/8/2010 10:34:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
It will probably be by position, which would suck. I can just see the battles now as people try to move their best player to different positions in order to avoid the extra coverage.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
159620.10 in reply to 159620.9
Date: 10/8/2010 11:01:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Well indeed, but also depends on preference boost. Will be supported prominent attacker able to score over zone man to man with guys around sensational ID? Or is it like that player have to be better than opponents defence to get most from him? That would mean there will be necessary to move best players on different position (while in fact they should just pass to each other to a different corner)

With increased demands on that player also increase the possibility that there is noone in your team who can play in that tactic. But if it would overplay specificly focused (inside/outside) tactic just by getting there your best players, it would not be probably so clever, because it would mean that you need just 1-2 players to beat opponents weakness on his defence.

Therefore if you know that he is going to play 3-2, instead of Look Inside, there would be better to play inside Isolation.

Last edited by aigidios at 10/8/2010 11:02:30 AM

This Post:
00
159620.11 in reply to 159620.10
Date: 10/19/2010 6:29:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
I still cannot set new tactics for my Thursday scrimmage. Please confirm if that will be possible.

This Post:
00
159620.13 in reply to 159620.12
Date: 10/20/2010 1:42:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
i love Defense and is one of my strong points. Box and 1 may work for me, when im out of cup i'll play it in a srcimmage

This Post:
11
159620.14 in reply to 159620.13
Date: 10/20/2010 4:23:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I have a question about the inside option of the box-and-1. From the perspective of real basketball, can someone give me an example of a team playing a box-and-1 against an inside player? I have been wracking my brain trying to think of when that might happen but can't. I know that Shaq used to get double teamed while the rest of the defense played a loose three man zone (before zones were legal even) and the double teaming of big men is common in NCAA and high school hoops, but I can't think of why a team would play a box-and-1 covering a big man. Just curious.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
159620.15 in reply to 159620.14
Date: 10/20/2010 9:44:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Didn't the Celtics try something similar at times against Howard and Orlando last season?

This Post:
00
159620.17 in reply to 159620.12
Date: 10/20/2010 12:54:18 PM
Leones del Cinaruco
FCBBP
Overall Posts Rated:
27092709
Another question: What if your best defender is a "fouler player"? I mean, if he is a more "physical player" and his foul's average is high?

This Post:
00
159620.18 in reply to 159620.17
Date: 10/20/2010 12:58:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Another question: What if your best defender is a "fouler player"? I mean, if he is a more "physical player" and his foul's average is high?

You have much more trouble using box and one,since you have an higher risk that your better defender will go out of the game soon

Advertisement